Re: filmscanners:Vuescan bugs isolated

2001-12-18 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 12/18/2001 5:35:10 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > That's the variable that changes things Ed..."release memory" reflips, lightens, > and compresses to 1/2 the contrast range in pshop. When I uncheck it I get > nice, full histograms, correctly flipped image. Yes, I've f

Re: filmscanners:Vuescan bugs isolated

2001-12-18 Thread jimhayes
Ed, I was just testing this very thing. I tried changing three things: 1) "focus" from "always" to "on preview"; 2) Changing both monitor and file space from Apple RGB to Adobe RGB and back (remember I have a b&w image); and 3) checking/unchecking the "release memory" box. I normally leave this u

Re: filmscanners:Vuescan bugs

2001-12-18 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 12/18/2001 4:16:28 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Ed it looks as if the SS 4000 pulls the film holder in and out a few times or > more > during scan. Do you perhaps have the "Prefs|Release memory" option turned on? This option causes this kind of problem. It's fixed

Re: filmscanners:Vuescan bugs

2001-12-18 Thread jimhayes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 12/17/2001 8:30:36 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > On my SS 4000, Win98SE version 7.33 worked fine. Using version 7.35 with b&w > > Tmax film the following happens: > > > > 1) Scan takes 15 minutes instead of about 3 minutes. > > Is the fi

Re: filmscanners:Vuescan 'bugs'

2001-12-18 Thread jimhayes
"Mark T." wrote: > Can't help with your problem, but I have to make comment (as president of I too am appreciative of Ed, since an early version 5 worked much better than Insight 3.5 on the SS 4000 for B&w about October of 1999. > > > > >4) I see from the viewscan site, he no longer answers e

Re: filmscanners:Vuescan bugs

2001-12-18 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 12/17/2001 8:30:36 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On my SS 4000, Win98SE version 7.33 worked fine. Using version 7.35 with b&w > Tmax film the following happens: > > 1) Scan takes 15 minutes instead of about 3 minutes. Is the film being physically scanned more than on

Re: filmscanners:Vuescan 'bugs'

2001-12-18 Thread Mark T.
Can't help with your problem, but I have to make comment (as president of the Ed Appreciation Society!) >4) I see from the viewscan site, he no longer answers e-mails for tech >support!!! Is this really so? Then why is the log file option box still >available? Given Ed is a one man show (or so

Re: filmscanners:Vuescan bugs

2001-12-17 Thread jimhayes
correction: that was version7.2.8 that I last tried it and it worked. jimhayes wrote: > On my SS 4000, Win98SE version 7.33 worked fine. Using version 7.35 with b&w > Tmax film the following happens: > > 1) Scan takes 15 minutes instead of about 3 minutes. > 2) The image opens up in photoshop up

Re: filmscanners:Vuescan bugs

2001-12-17 Thread John Rylatt
Hi Jim, I had a 'bug' with 7.3.5 with slides scanned on FS4000. The scan was very long. I got a muddy brown picture (flipped) when viewed in Photoshop. The histogram spanned only the center portion of the display. The cure was simple. I just rebooted the computer! John. jimhayes wrote: > > O

filmscanners:Vuescan bugs

2001-12-17 Thread jimhayes
On my SS 4000, Win98SE version 7.33 worked fine. Using version 7.35 with b&w Tmax film the following happens: 1) Scan takes 15 minutes instead of about 3 minutes. 2) The image opens up in photoshop upside down and too light, with a histogram that spans only about half the range. I selected "flip"