Re: filmscanners: Kodak Color Input Targets

2001-03-06 Thread IronWorks
I would think that 1 slide target would be sufficient because you are calibrating the scanner as a whole once, not 2 separate calibrations - one for Kodachrome and one for Ektachrome. I think, however, that you would be wise to also purchase the 5X7 Ektacolor target, to compare to your monitor af

Re: filmscanners: Kodak Color Input Targets

2001-03-06 Thread Mário Teixeira
I don't know about the Acer but my Microtek ArtixScan 4000t (now it is already working well again!) came with the Q60-E3 slide and the corresponding profiling software bundled and included in the price. I think that the color targets are useless unless you have the profiling software for the the s

Re: filmscanners: Kodak Color Input Targets

2001-03-06 Thread Alan Tyson
I have a Scanwit 2720s, with which I am well pleased. It's much the best budget scanner, by all accounts. However, even with Ed Hamrick's Vuescan (a nearly essential $40 accessory for most scanners) you can exert only limited control over its initial output. You'll get its own automatic exposure

re: filmscanners: Kodak Color Input Targets

2001-03-06 Thread Alan Womack
A few things to think about in the project of scans. What is your goal? Color accuracy of the current state of the slide or good looking scans that may not reflect the original scene. The main disadvantage with the ScanWit is the exposure is fixed, vuescan does not very the capture time at th

Re: filmscanners: Kodak Color Input Targets

2001-03-06 Thread Mark Thomas
At 12:15 AM 7/03/01 +, you wrote: >I don't know about the Acer but my Microtek ArtixScan 4000t (now it is >already working well again!) came with the Q60-E3 slide No, the Acer bundle does not include a target or any profiling stuff. You're left pretty much on your own, but at that price lev

RE: filmscanners: Kodak Color Input Targets

2001-03-06 Thread Frank Paris
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Thomas > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 10:00 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: filmscanners: Kodak Color Input Targets > > > Is there such a thing as a correct monitor? ;-) I don't fuss >

re: filmscanners: Kodak Color Input Targets

2001-03-07 Thread Lynn Allen
Alan W wrote: >On slides it's mostly a moot point unless they are underexposed. >Also Kodachrome is a denser slide generally, which can drop shadows too low for many scanners to distinguish properly. I've found that my Scanwit 2720S does a really good job on well-exposed slides and negs, and i

Re: filmscanners: Kodak Color Input Targets

2001-03-07 Thread Alan Tyson
om: Lynn Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 3:34 PM Subject: re: filmscanners: Kodak Color Input Targets

re: filmscanners: Kodak Color Input Targets

2001-03-07 Thread Mark T.
>Lyn A wrote: >>Alan W wrote: > >>On slides it's mostly a moot point unless they are underexposed. >>Also Kodachrome is a denser slide generally, which can drop shadows too low >for many scanners to distinguish properly. > >I've found that my Scanwit 2720S does a really good job on well-exposed