No, no, that's way too basic an answer, all but the most novice of us know how to use
Gamma, but brightness had a more pronounced effect on shadows than gamma does without
the side effect of over brighting the top half of the image range. Also playing with
Gamma + drops saturation which makes
reciated.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Womack
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2001 7:47 PM
To: Majordomo leben.com
Subject: re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.1.17 Available
No, no, that's way too basic an answer, all but the m
e for rich
colors.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Van Buskirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 9:30 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: VueScan 7.1.17 Available
[snipped]
| I've played
| with all the Vuescan settings
In a message dated 9/30/2001 9:38:01 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've played
> with all the Vuescan settings for HOURS and HOURS, but I just can't seem to
> get a nice, rich scan without dragging it in to Photoshop. I've also had
> the same problems with over brightness, but have been
"Mark Van Buskirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but that point is moot, as they don't support the Canon FS4000. I've
played
> with all the Vuescan settings for HOURS and HOURS, but I just can't seem
to
> get a nice, rich scan without dragging it in to Photoshop.
Unless the story has changed, AIUI
>. I've played
>with all the Vuescan settings for HOURS and HOURS, but I just can't seem to
>get a nice, rich scan without dragging it in to Photoshop. I've also had
>the same problems with over brightness, but have been able to work around
>that issue as you and some of the other posters have s
