Second post--I had misread Matthew's post. Like Éric, I noticed more
sluggishness, especially when using on my PowerBook 400 (to Dennis:
which isn't quite as easy to upgrade video-wise as a desktop box).
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 06:00 PM, Matthew Hindson wrote:
> I've downloaded and
Yes, I immediately noticed the difference, as I switched during a large
project. Maybe both of us imagined it...
Tim
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 06:00 PM, Matthew Hindson wrote:
> I've downloaded and installed the Finale 2003 demo, and there are some
> nice
> new features in there (e.g
On Thursday, Oct 3, 2002, at 12:07 US/Pacific, Mr. Liudas Motekaitis
wrote:
> I'm not on Mac, but I really think there must be some simple freeware
> out there to do the simple trick of combining a bunch of .ps files
> into the order you want them into PDF file. If I were in your
> situation,
On Thursday, Oct 3, 2002, at 02:57 US/Pacific, David H. Bailey wrote:
> I must say that for all the years I have been on this list I have
> never had a problem with Andrew Stiller's attributions in his post.
> It has always been clear to me, if it has ever been really important.
>
> I find tha
Le jeudi, 3 oct 2002, à 18:00 America/Montreal, Matthew Hindson a écrit
:
> What seemed most useful, however, was an apparent increase in screen
> redrawing speed when dealing with large files. Has anyone else come
> across
> this yet? Or is it just my imagination?
Although screen redrawing
At 08:00 AM 10/4/02 +1000, Matthew Hindson wrote:
>What seemed most useful, however, was an apparent increase in screen
>redrawing speed when dealing with large files. Has anyone else come across
>this yet? Or is it just my imagination?
Is screen redrawing still an issue? What's the speed of yo
In a message dated 10/3/02 6:07:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Yeah, but they're still ahead of Harry Connick Jr., whose "idea" amounts to
little more than having everyone in the band sit in front of a Mac monitor
displaying a Finale file. >>
ActualIy I think they're PDF files but I agree
At 7:59 PM 10/02/02, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
[answering me]
>>The real leader in this field is
>>FreeHand Systems. It's still in the early stages, but they have actual
>>products along the lines of what you describe.
>
>Hasn't this been in the "early stages" for, like, years? :)
Yeah, but t
At 9:28 PM 10/02/02, T B wrote:
>Has anyone ever noticed Finale dropping an entire
>stave from a system? All lines appear as normal in
>the scroll view, but in the page view, the trumpet
>disappears, for example. the missing staff is also
>missing when the score is printed, (which I did not
>not
I've downloaded and installed the Finale 2003 demo, and there are some nice
new features in there (e.g. automatic left-justification of syllables
beginning melismas (or whatever you set the justification to be)). I like
the new, spacious cosmetic layout changes in so many of the dialog boxes.
On
>>- In Scroll view, use Shift-Click to select the staves you need. Be sure
>>to click directly on the handles of the staves in order to make a
>>discontinuous selection.
- Turn on Special Part Extraction in the Edit menu.
- Go to Page view. <<
I will try this! Thanks!
Crystal Premo
[EMAIL PRO
<>
I was wondering today if that would work. Thanks! I will do it tonight!
Crystal Premo
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide
>>On PC, CTL-click is the default Windows behavior to select discontinuous
>>items -- but Finale doesn't implement it, especially for the mass mover
>>tool<<
Yeah, I tried this, too.
<>
This is my plan. It won't be too bad.
Crystal Premo
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 03.10.2002 21:01 Uhr, Robert Patterson wrote
> On Thu, 03 October 2002, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
>
>> the thing has to go to the printer as a PDF file.
>>
>
> You could do that with the Finale print options, and print the pages in any
> order you want.
True. I hadn't thought of this. Howeve
At 8:42 PM +0200 10/3/02, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
>Thanks for the tips.
>
>Believe me, I am more than annoyed about this particular customer. I told
>him several times that I need the final order of the pieces before I prepare
>the final correction copy for him. Now he sends me the final correctio
On 10/3/02 1:50 PM or thereabouts, Michael Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
intoned:
> At 10:23 -0400 3/10/2002, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>> You're on a Mac, right? Use command-click to select discontinuous
>> staves using the staff tool, then create a new group and extract
>> only that group.
>
> I th
I don't think the situation is a hopeless as you think. You don't have to
save the entire file directly from Finale as one PDF file. You can save it
in sections, when you make your postscript listing. Then you can use one of
several available (some are even freeware, I believe) PDF distiller progr
On Thu, 03 October 2002, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> the thing has to go to the printer as a PDF file.
>
You could do that with the Finale print options, and print the pages in any
order you want.
--
Robert Patterson
http://RobertGPatterson.com
___
Fi
Thanks for the tips.
Believe me, I am more than annoyed about this particular customer. I told
him several times that I need the final order of the pieces before I prepare
the final correction copy for him. Now he sends me the final correction copy
back with several pieces exchanged in the order,
On 03.10.2002 13:07 Uhr, Mr. Liudas Motekaitis wrote
> Wouldn't it be a lot easier just to renumber the pages and then after
> print-out just resort the pages? (unless there are some pieces which don't
> end/begin on a new page).
No, because the thing has to go to the printer as a PDF file.
Joh
At 0:25 -0400 3/10/2002, Crystal Premo wrote:
>I have been trying to figure out how to select parts from a large
>score into what will amount to a piano-conductor's score, but can't
>find a way to selecting, e.g., the top staff, the middle staff and
>the bottom staff. Is this impossible, or am
One thing you could do:
Move the staves you want to extract next to eachother, sort the staves,
make a group of the staves you want to extract (name the group for
example "extract"), finally extract only that group. Be sure not to save
your score!
Crystal Premo schreef:
>
> I have been trying t
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 07:38 AM, Crystal Premo wrote:
> Excuse me if I am repeating this, but I posted it very late last night
> and do not see it here this morning:
>
> I would like to extract only *some* instruments into a sort of
> piano-conductor score, and cannot find the way t
You've identified the only non-obvious issue: mid-measure clef changes. You may
find that you have better results by (instead of Move Everything) using Move
Entries and selecting everything (including clefs) and then also selecting
everything under Move Measures or at least what you want to move.
At 07:38 AM 10/3/02 -0400, Crystal Premo wrote:
>I would like to extract only *some* instruments into a sort of
>piano-conductor score, and cannot find the way to select, e.g. the top
>staff, one two staves down, and the one two staves below that.
On PC, CTL-click is the default Windows behavio
Le jeudi, 3 oct 2002, à 07:07 America/Montreal, Mr. Liudas Motekaitis a
écrit :
> Wouldn't it be a lot easier just to renumber the pages and then after
> print-out just resort the pages? (unless there are some pieces which
> don't
> end/begin on a new page).
If you use a DTP program for your
At 10/03/2002 05:57 AM, David H. Bailey wrote:
>I'll probably get yelled at because I had the nerve to place my reply
>ABOVE the quoted material! Flame away!
All the lists I have been on, always argue about whether quotes should be
over or under.
I think it depends on how the user's email p
Excuse me if I am repeating this, but I posted it very late last night and
do not see it here this morning:
I would like to extract only *some* instruments into a sort of
piano-conductor score, and cannot find the way to select, e.g. the top
staff, one two staves down, and the one two staves b
Wouldn't it be a lot easier just to renumber the pages and then after
print-out just resort the pages? (unless there are some pieces which don't
end/begin on a new page).
Liudas Motekaitis
www.balticsun.com
- Original Message -
From: Johannes Gebauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Finale list <
I must say that for all the years I have been on this list I have never
had a problem with Andrew Stiller's attributions in his post. It has
always been clear to me, if it has ever been really important.
I find that on this list (for me, anyway) it matters less who said what
than what was sai
I would make a copy of the score with a different name (e.g.
Myscorecondensed.mus) and from that I would simply delete the staves I
didn't want in the final score.
Another way would be to go to the Staff tool, double-click the handle of
a staff you don't want and in the dialog check the Hide S
David W. Fenton wrote:
> On 2 Oct 2002 at 21:53, David H. Bailey wrote:
>
>
>>Heck, Mozart had to be the soloist to earn most of his
>>commissions! . . .
>
>
> ???
>
> He ran his own concerts as soloist and made money in his first few
> seasons and barely broke even after that. He was, of
I am working on a large file, consisting of individual pieces between 1 an 4
pages long. Now the composer wants to exchange two of those pieces. I guess
I have to do this by cutting and pasting the measures. Is there anything I
need to observe, to prevent damage, like missing clef changes, etc?
J
I've never managed it yet!
I know it's a kludge, but I've done this in the past by taking a copy of the score and deleting the staves I didn't want, then sorting out the formatting so that the new score *is* the piano-conductor part.
Michael Withers
--- On Thu 10/03, Crystal Premo wrote:
> I
On Wednesday, Oct 2, 2002, at 15:31 US/Pacific, shirling & neueweise
wrote:
> From: Philip Aker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> With modern email applications such as Eudora, it's more likely that
>> one would have to go out of their way not to have a properly quoted
>> reply.
> unless you receive the
- Original Message -
From: David W. Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The other thing the article leaves out is that there's an awful lot
> of good music that's been left on history's cutting room floor, some
> of it significantly better than the music that's made it into the
> narrative of mu
On Wednesday, Oct 2, 2002, at 13:19 US/Pacific, Andrew Stiller wrote:
> And BTW, apropos of another thread please note the "standard" quote
> identifier at the top of this. Looks like I'm replying to my own
> message, doesn't it? Very clear and useful--not. Pardon me if I
> refrain.
Looks li
37 matches
Mail list logo
