why could MakeMusic not make an option to add rehearsal numbers w/
enclosures at every double bar that you define? - the option could also
exist to use letters or to do pre-defined numbers (every X number of
measures, insert a rehearsal letter/number) - shouldn't be that
difficult, even for the
These options all still increment the counter by one for each measure. David
needs the counter incremented every 8 measures. A highly convoluted way
would be to set up a whole new font. I see no way out but text expressions.
Richard Yates
> In the measure number box, go to Style, where you can d
In the measure number box, go to Style, where you can define a measuring
number system. Add a region (so region 1 will number measures
conventionally). Experiment with the base numbering system. At the worst,
you can specify a lettering system if the numbering base is too clunky.
At 06:55 PM 4
I could really use a plugin which can copy text blocks on a per page basis
from one document to another. There should be an option to copy only text
blocks which are limited to that one page, or also those which appear on a
page range or on all pages.
Perhaps the TGTools text block transfer functio
I'm doing a Pachelbel Canon arrangement (for a wedding gig -- I
certainly wouldn't do it for fun!), and want to automatically number
each time through the ground. I want the first numbered 1, the second
(m. 9) 2, the third (m. 17), 3, and so forth.
Is there any automatic way of doing this at al
On Apr 11, 2004, at 4:27 PM, John Howell wrote:
Hey, read my message again. We're on the same side, here! I was
simply making the point that there are different criteria for printing
than for singing. Non-singers may not know that. And singers often
get hung up trying to write down the word
At 2:48 PM -0700 4/11/04, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Apr 11, 2004, at 1:10 PM, John Howell wrote:
I should also point out that Mark's suggestion makes reading the
words much quicker and intuitive. But of course a singer isn't
going to actually pronounce them that way. Tacking the consonant
onto the
On Apr 11, 2004, at 1:10 PM, John Howell wrote:
I should also point out that Mark's suggestion makes reading the words
much quicker and intuitive. But of course a singer isn't going to
actually pronounce them that way. Tacking the consonant onto the 2nd
syllable is good vocal practice: "may-
Sorry about the html being dropped. It's part of our SPAM protection.
You fail yo note MAC or PC. This might help a bit;-)
--
Henry Howey, D.M.A.
Professor of Music
Sam Houston State University
Box 2208
Huntsville, TX 77341
(936) 294-1364
http://www.shsu.edu/~music/faculty/howey.html
Owner of FIN
At 7:03 PM -0700 4/10/04, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Apr 10, 2004, at 4:53 PM, Ryan Beard wrote:
I'm working on a choir piece based on Psalm 23. I'm
having trouble finding the correct syllabification of
some of the King James English words like "maketh,"
"leadeth," "restoreth," "preparest" all those "-e
> There is one school of thought that says always split after a long
> vowel, in which case you would have "ma-king". I've seen that in some
> 19th century British editions, but I think it's pretty much rejected
> now. If you agree with "ma-king" then you should also do "ma-keth" to
> be consiste
11 matches
Mail list logo