>On 3 Jan 2003 at 13:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Go here for one of the most famous hoaxes in academic history:
>> This Physics professor at NYU wrote a Pomo-style article full of nonsense
cliches
>> strung together. It was "peer-reviewed," accepted, and published by one
of
>> the leading Po
Go here for one of the most famous hoaxes in academic history:
This Physics professor at NYU wrote a Pomo-style article full of nonsense cliches
strung together. It was "peer-reviewed," accepted, and published by one of
the leading Pomo journals.
http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/
Jim
___
>I got into a debate with someone over Postmodernism, and realized
>that I had no clear idea of what the term was supposed to mean when
>applied to music.
Here's my understanding:
"Pomo" does not apply to a work itself or to its creator. It applies to a style
of analysis that can be imposed up
>FYI
Chuck, that has been known for quite some time.
I thought it had been fixed on the Windoze side, but I'm going to take another
look at it--sometimes these "features" get re-introduced...
Jim Williams
>
>This sent to Coda:
>
>Create a score (in 2002 latest), set pickup as one quarter note,
>FYI
Chuck, that has been known for quite some time.
I thought it had been fixed on the Windoze side, but I'm going to take another
look at it--sometimes these "features" get re-introduced...
Jim Williams
>
>This sent to Coda:
>
>Create a score (in 2002 latest), set pickup as one quarter note,
