At 3:30 PM -0700 4/12/04, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On 4/12/04 3:06 PM, Owain Sutton wrote:
My preference, from a performer's perspective, would be to have the
whole thing in 20/8, and use dotted barlines to show the irregular
subdivisions.
I have two different suggestions:
1. Like Owain suggested,
On 4/12/04 3:06 PM, Owain Sutton wrote:
> My preference, from a performer's perspective, would be to have the
> whole thing in 20/8, and use dotted barlines to show the irregular
> subdivisions.
I have two different suggestions:
1. Like Owain suggested, use 16/8 (not 20) throughout, and notate
(3
I have seen similar "amorphous" time signature works where such a time
signature is given once and the metric groupings shifts, giving it the
amorphous character. But it was clear from the music that the groupings
as indicated in the time signature would be moving around within the
measures.
My preference, from a performer's perspective, would be to have the
whole thing in 20/8, and use dotted barlines to show the irregular
subdivisions.
Taris L Flashpaw wrote:
Hi all!
I figured I'd tap the wisdom of the list on this one. A new piece
I've started to write is in a rather unusua
Hi all!
I figured I'd tap the wisdom of the list on this one. A new piece I've
started to write is in a rather unusual time signature (12/8 + 2/4) and it
starts off having the four dotted quarters followed by the two plain
quarters. However, I'd like to move the two plain quarters around in th
