Re: [Finale] FinMac 2004b sys 9 -- horrible

2004-04-21 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 21.04.2004 14:16 Uhr, Philip Aker wrote > On Tuesday, Apr 20, 2004, at 14:56 US/Pacific, Johannes Gebauer wrote: > >> In fact I _really_ hope that OS 9 will be dropped for 2k5 in favour of >> a bug free, speedier OS X. > > Concerning EPS manquée, would you find Import/Export PDF facilities >

Re: [Finale] FinMac 2004b sys 9 -- horrible

2004-04-21 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 21.04.2004 14:13 Uhr, gj.berg wrote > re the other command/option/shift and click screen to reduce and blammo 5%! Works fine in OS X. Johannes -- http://www.musikmanufaktur.com http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PRO

Re: [Finale] FinMac 2004b sys 9 -- horrible

2004-04-21 Thread gj.berg
Thanks Johannes but I figured that out -- I just don't understand why these things are so big. re the other command/option/shift and click screen to reduce and blammo 5%! Jerry Johannes Gebauer wrote: On 20.04.2004 22:49 Uhr, gj.berg wrote The meta-tool resize command is all me

Re: [Finale] FinMac 2004b sys 9 -- horrible

2004-04-21 Thread Philip Aker
On Tuesday, Apr 20, 2004, at 14:56 US/Pacific, Johannes Gebauer wrote: In fact I _really_ hope that OS 9 will be dropped for 2k5 in favour of a bug free, speedier OS X. Concerning EPS manquée, would you find Import/Export PDF facilities instead of EPS to be a viable option? Philip Aker http://w

Re: [Finale] FinMac 2004b sys 9 -- horrible

2004-04-20 Thread Jerry W. Kortge
Gadzooks, I must be the other! Jerry >At 2:15 PM -0700 4/20/04, Philip Aker wrote: >>I think it best if the OS 9 version was dropped. In fact, it might >>have been cheaper for Coda to buy the 2 users still running it new >>G5s rather than pay the engineers for the several months of effort >>put in

Re: [Finale] FinMac 2004b sys 9 -- horrible

2004-04-20 Thread David W. Fenton
On 20 Apr 2004 at 14:15, Philip Aker wrote: > I think it best if the OS 9 version was dropped. In fact, it might > have been cheaper for Coda to buy the 2 users still running it new G5s > rather than pay the engineers for the several months of effort put > into it. Er, I suspect there are a lot m

Re: [Finale] FinMac 2004b sys 9 -- horrible

2004-04-20 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 20.04.2004 23:15 Uhr, Philip Aker wrote > I think it best if the OS 9 version was dropped. In fact, it might have > been cheaper for Coda to buy the 2 users still running it new G5s > rather than pay the engineers for the several months of effort put into > it. I wouldn't have put it quite as

Re: [Finale] FinMac 2004b sys 9 -- horrible

2004-04-20 Thread Christopher BJ Smith
At 2:15 PM -0700 4/20/04, Philip Aker wrote: I think it best if the OS 9 version was dropped. In fact, it might have been cheaper for Coda to buy the 2 users still running it new G5s rather than pay the engineers for the several months of effort put into it. Philip Aker Hmm, one would be me.

Re: [Finale] FinMac 2004b sys 9 -- horrible

2004-04-20 Thread Philip Aker
On Tuesday, Apr 20, 2004, at 13:49 US/Pacific, gj.berg wrote: Yup, it most certainly is. It has acquired this Lemur like blink --- very slow blink and then a thought and then the command. Arg! The meta-tool resize command is all messed up -- you hit for half size and dang if it doesn't decide

Re: [Finale] FinMac 2004b sys 9 -- horrible

2004-04-20 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 20.04.2004 22:49 Uhr, gj.berg wrote > The meta-tool resize command is all messed up -- you hit for half size > and dang if it doesn't decide to go all the way down to 5%. > What do you mean by the meta-tool resize command? > > The bubble tools are even larger -- more screen space gone. What

[Finale] FinMac 2004b sys 9 -- horrible

2004-04-20 Thread gj.berg
Yup, it most certainly is. It has acquired this Lemur like blink --- very slow blink and then a thought and then the command. Arg! The meta-tool resize command is all messed up -- you hit for half size and dang if it doesn't decide to go all the way down to 5%. My back is one ball of tension k