> isn't it true that the actual process of extracting Audio CDs can, and to
a certain
> extend will, introduce errors? Here on the Mac side of things we have
> several tools to reduce these errors, they usually do this by reading the
> data several times and comparing.
Some extraction programs hav
On 20.02.2004 9:22 Uhr, Mr. Liudas Motekaitis wrote
> Johannes is correct about Audio CD's not being ideal, however, it is not
> true that you don't get 100% digital copies off of Audio CD's. This is
> widely misunderstood. The truth is: the only difference from one Audio CD to
> another is the ji
> > We thought direct to CD because of inexpensive media, and ease of
transfer
> > to computer for editing-out of applause and blank spaces.
>
> This is not an ideal media to record to. The main reason is that Audio CDs
> have very poor error correction and this means that it is unlikely that
> you
On 20.02.2004 1:37 Uhr, David Froom wrote
> We thought direct to CD because of inexpensive media, and ease of transfer
> to computer for editing-out of applause and blank spaces.
This is not an ideal media to record to. The main reason is that Audio CDs
have very poor error correction and this me
At 07:37 PM 2/19/04 -0500, David Froom wrote:
>My college is looking to move on/up from DAT recording for our live concert
>recording/archiving. Can anyone recommend a reasonably priced alternative?
>Recording directly to CD? Hard drive? Some combination?
For simplicity, try the Fostex multitra
Hello,
My apologies if you are reading this more than once. My email server is
sending (or not sending) messages unpredictably.
My college is looking to move on/up from DAT recording for our live concert
recording/archiving. Can anyone recommend a reasonably priced alternative?
Recording direct
