At 7:57 AM -0500 2/21/04, David H. Bailey wrote:
The same with rhythmic alignment -- it works as I expect it to.
When I entered additional rhythmic values (e.g. quarters in layer 1
and 8ths/16ths in layer2) they lined up properly.
Try it in page view. (At least for me, it doesn't happen in scro
I just tried your ties issue again, and still, using Win98se and
Fin2004a, the tie in a 2nd layer points to the right from the final
note, even with material entered in another layer. (You are hitting the
= key and not ctrl-= aren't you?)
The same with rhythmic alignment -- it works as I expect
- Original Message -
From: "David H. Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I see a clearly distinct different color for the grey of other layers --
> I have no trouble differentiating between one layer and another in
> speedy entry.
I investigated this and found that I would need to recalibrate
At 1:38 PM +0200 2/21/04, Mr. Liudas Motekaitis wrote:
Try entering Layer two based on what is already entered in Layer one.
Nothing lines up rhythmically until you exit Speedy.
I noticed this too in 2004 (Mac) and find it very disorienting and
confusing. I'll have to add it to my 3rd large insta
- Original Message -
From: "David H. Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Win98se, Fin2004a, ties entered onto notes at the end of a measure in
> speedy still head off into space to the right waiting for the next note.
I notice this while editing measures which already have notes in them. Fo
Maybe you should leave Windows 2000? ;-) (just joking!)
On Win98se, Fin2004a, ties entered onto notes at the end of a measure in
speedy still head off into space to the right waiting for the next note.
This is the same whether I have Jump to Next Measure checked or not.
I see a clearly distin
Finale 2004 Windows 2000: When working in Speedy, ties which begin at the
last note are displayed backwards: they go left rather than to the right
into the next measure. This is a downgrade in performance compared to older
versions. Also, when working in Speedy, the notes are not placed correctly
i
