Re: [Finale] TAN: More QuicKeys in Classic

2004-02-07 Thread Darcy James Argue
Officially, I don't think QuicKeys 4.1 is even compatible with OS 9.2.2? I could be wrong on that score, though. Anyway, response time for QuicKeys 5 shortcuts is decent enough for me in Classic, with the exception of sequences, which are extremely sluggish. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Finale] TAN: More QuicKeys in Classic

2004-02-07 Thread JD
on 2/7/04 9:14 AM, Robert Patterson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I installed my QuicKeys (v4.1) in my Classic folder. It works, but the > commands (esp. the menu commands for Finale tools) are unacceptably > sluggish. Has anyone else experienced this? Do QK5 users have the same > problem? Robert

[Finale] TAN: More QuicKeys in Classic

2004-02-07 Thread Robert Patterson
I installed my QuicKeys (v4.1) in my Classic folder. It works, but the commands (esp. the menu commands for Finale tools) are unacceptably sluggish. Has anyone else experienced this? Do QK5 users have the same problem? -- Robert Patterson http://RobertGPatterson.com ___