Re: [Fwd: Re: [Finale] timing]

2002-09-30 Thread David H. Bailey
ou do need to set those tempo indications to playback at the proper speed. Bob Florence wrote: > I tried Finale's timing calculator on a piece that I knew the timing. > It was way off. > > BF > > ---- Original Message > Subject: Re: [Finale] timing > Dat

[Fwd: Re: [Finale] timing]

2002-09-29 Thread Bob Florence
I tried Finale's timing calculator on a piece that I knew the timing. It was way off. BF Original Message Subject: Re: [Finale] timing Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 18:44:01 -0400 From: "David H. Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL

Re: [Finale] timing

2002-09-29 Thread David H. Bailey
The problem with the timer function of Finale is that if you make timing changes with the tempo tool, it doesn't take those into account. As long as you don't use the tempo tool, the timing seems to be accurate. Jonathan Smith wrote: > Bob, > > Finale has its own little timing calculator buil

Re: [Finale] timing

2002-09-29 Thread Jonathan Smith
Bob, Finale has its own little timing calculator built in as mass mover metatool 5, (assuming that your timing requirements are from completed finale files). With the mass mover click in front of the top stave, therefore selecting the entire piece and hit 5. Finale will automatically calculat

Re: [Finale] timing

2002-09-28 Thread David H. Bailey
Multiple the total bars by the number of beats in each bar (so a 90 measure work in 4/4 would have 360 beats) and divide this total by the tempo in beats/minute. So the 360 beats, if performed at a tempo of 60 would take 6 minutes. If the work has sections in different time signatures but at

[Finale] timing

2002-09-28 Thread Bob Florence
Hi all: What is the formula for timing music without a stopwatch? Something about number of bars or beats and measures and rate of spped. Thanks; BF ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale