Hm, again. I regularly accept differences between rest notation and
the same rhythm in notes; for example I syncopate note values, but I
would never notate a rest syncopated, example:
1/8, 1/4, 1/8
is perfect as notes, but make the 1/4 a rest and it is not acceptable
to me. I would have to bre
I am sure this is a good idea, however, in an "Urtext" edition of 18th
century French music I somehow feel this kind of symbol is a little out of
place.
I haven't quite decided what to do, but I tend towards using exactly what
the source gives, which is a normal half rest for half a measure. The
a
At 9:45 PM +0100 11/03/03, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
How would one indicate a rest for exactly half a measure of 18/8 (which is
basically two 9/8 measures, with six beats per measure, one beat per dotted
quarter)? In the 18th century print I am working from I see a half rest, how
would this be notate
Hm, I would ask myself: 'What would be a clear notation of a *note* of
the same length?' and I guess three tied dotted quarter notes could be
one rigth answer, so for the rest I would choose three dotted quarter
rests. This notation really shows the 'triple-ness' of the time.
Klaas.
Op 3-nov-0
Hmm...Even though I do not like dotted rests, I'd probably do it as a
dotted half rest and a dotted quarter rest or as three dotted quarter
rests...
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Gebauer, Johannes
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:
At 9:45 PM +0100 11/03/03, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
How would one indicate a rest for exactly half a measure of 18/8 (which is
basically two 9/8 measures, with six beats per measure, one beat per dotted
quarter)? In the 18th century print I am working from I see a half rest, how
would this be notate
