Isn't this just plain illegal? Since I assume you only once bought
Finale full, and then bought upgrades, you still only have one serial
number. Although you are obviously permitted to run as many different
versions of Finale as you own, I doubt very much that you can give away
an early
As long as I remember it was the shift key. That means at least some 3.x
version.
Johannes
A-NO-NE Music schrieb:
Don Hart / 2005/06/24 / 11:37 AM wrote:
Hold the shift key (Mac) down and choose update layout from
the edit menu.
What?!
Ever since version 1.0, it was Opt key, and
dhbailey schrieb:
Sharing it with another Finale user who ALSO has a legally purchased
license wouldn't be illegal. That person has paid for and is
legitimately allowed to use Finale, too.
Perhaps I am counting fly legs here, but strictly speaking I do not
believe this is true. The
At 11:15 AM 6/27/05 -0400, Andrew Stiller wrote:
If one of the
folks on this list, for example, were to take their original Finale 1.0
diskette, stick it in liquid nitrogen to preserve it, and later sell it
to a museum, I would regard that as, quite literally, none of
MakeMusic's business,
Unless it is explicitly permitted in the language of the legal mumbo-jumbo page
that we all scroll past in the install process so that we can click on I
Agree without reading, then you cannot.
However, if my memory serves me correctly, the last time I installed Finale
2005 on my machine, I
On 27 Jun 2005 at 8:18, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:39:25 -0500, Robert Patterson wrote:
Has anyone ever seen this error? I'm getting it when I try to open a
file in Fin05b. My friend has sent both the .mus and the .etf, and
both get the same error.
I have seen that
At 6/27/2005 11:28 AM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
The issue of preservation of older software, especially games, is a
big
deal now. The US Copyright Office recently had a call for comments
on
'abandonware' and what it means and how the current law applies.
The
definition of 'abandonware' is
At 6/27/2005 12:07 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 27 Jun 2005 at 8:18, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:39:25 -0500, Robert Patterson wrote:
Has anyone ever seen this error? I'm getting it when I try to open a
file in Fin05b. My friend has sent both the .mus and the .etf, and
On Jun 27, 2005, at 12:07 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 27 Jun 2005 at 8:18, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:39:25 -0500, Robert Patterson wrote:
Has anyone ever seen this error? I'm getting it when I try to open a
file in Fin05b. My friend has sent both the .mus and the .etf,
Friends
Regarding the antique software of which Andrew Stiller wrote, my
informed lay opinion [NB: I am not an attorney of and do not play one
on either the radio, or the internet] is that there are two overlapping
concerns. With respect to the manuals and media upon which a version of
I wonder what MM's policy is with regards to selling Finale Mac 2003?
The web site says that they will sell Finale 2004 for the Mac on
system 9, but everyone knows that it is unusable. Finale Mac 2003 in
system 9 is still faster than the current versions and would
therefore be fairly valuable.
On 6/26/05, Simon Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not finding the commands to batch print to PDF in either
FinaleScript *or* TGTools. How, exactly, is this accomplished?
I have a completely different route. I use a quickeys macro to open every
document sequentially and compile a
The Grokster decision today is probably of interest to most of us here, at
least the US crowd:
http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/pdf/ne/2005/grokster/04-480o.pdf
Dennis
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On Jun 27, 2005, at 1:50 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On 6/26/05, Simon Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not finding the commands to batch print to PDF in either
FinaleScript *or* TGTools. How, exactly, is this accomplished?
I have a completely different route. I use a quickeys macro to open
I have recently discovered awonderful PDF maker for Windows available for a FREE download from
http://daneprairie.com/download/download.htm
It installs itself as a printer, so - when conversion to PDF is needed - one hits Print, choses it as the printer, and - voila! PDF file from Finale or any
Neal G wrote:
Just did a test of this using OS 10.4.1 and FinMac 2005b...
My first experiment using Automator
Created a Workflow for Finder consisting of
1. Get Specified Finder Items
2. Print Finder Items
In the window for #1, I clicked on the + button, which called up a
dialogue
On 27 Jun 2005, at 20:24, Christopher Smith wrote:Somebody (jef?) mentioned that you can set the default print dialogue in OSX to always print to PDF, as part of the settings. Where it says Copies and Pages in the print dialogue, select Output Options, click on Save To File. PDF is the default
Here's some good commentary on the decision:
http://yglesias.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/6/27/115956/954
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 27 Jun 2005, at 2:06 PM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
The Grokster decision today is probably of interest to most of us
here, at
least the US
I really hoped Finale would get professional again and fix the EPS support
after about 10 years...:-(
I ordered it believing this would happen, but I guess I will have to switch
to Sibelius finally... (They got it to work, so they really must be the
better programmers). Sh*t! I NEED EPS
On 6/27/05, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 27, 2005, at 1:50 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On 6/26/05, Simon Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not finding the commands to batch print to PDF in either
FinaleScript *or* TGTools. How, exactly, is this accomplished?
I have a
Hi,
I'm thinking of upgrading to an ATI Radeon 9000 Pro 128MB AGP graphic
card. Having next to no experience in this field, I'd like to ask the
mac gurus on this list if such an upgrade will improve finale's
performance in any way.
Present system is a G4 AGP graphics, upgraded with sonnet
On 27 Jun 2005 at 12:50, Phil Daley wrote:
At 6/27/2005 12:07 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 27 Jun 2005 at 8:18, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:39:25 -0500, Robert Patterson wrote:
Has anyone ever seen this error? I'm getting it when I try to
open a file in Fin05b.
David W. Fenton / 2005/06/27 / 06:59 PM wrote:
I've never heard of such a thing.
Ur... Resource Folk, in case of legacy Mac file format. It will be
stripped out via mail server.
--
- Hiro
Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA
http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com
On 27 Jun 2005 at 19:24, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
David W. Fenton / 2005/06/27 / 06:59 PM wrote:
I've never heard of such a thing.
Ur... Resource Folk, in case of legacy Mac file format. It will be
stripped out via mail server.
How so? If it's part of the encapsulated email message, it
Hi Hans,
The graphic card will probably not noticeably affect Finale 2k5's
redraw speed, although it will make many of OS X's various bells and
whistles run more smoothly (especially if you upgrade to 10.4 Tiger).
It would probably also help the response time when cycling *between*
windows
On Jun 25, 2005, at 10:10 AM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
I know I am in the minority here, but I confess I prefer Finale's
default beaming to that produced by Patterson Beams.
I felt that way about Patterson Beams when I first tried it, but a
client cared about that white wedges stuff, so I
26 matches
Mail list logo
