David W. Fenton wrote:
On 29 Oct 2005 at 17:06, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
At this point, I am quite sure all of this is related to the legacy
temp file system Finale uses.
I thought Finale 2006 was the first to *abandon* the old temp file
system for in memory temporary data? That was what makes
On 29 Oct 2005 at 17:06, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
> At this point, I am quite sure all of this is related to the legacy
> temp file system Finale uses.
I thought Finale 2006 was the first to *abandon* the old temp file
system for in memory temporary data? That was what makes the saves
faster, I tho
On 29 Oct 2005, at 6:31 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
On the subject of PDFs, I read this in the OSX-The Missing Manual.
It says that the PDFs created from the OSX print dialogue are
screen-optimised—that is, they look best on screen, but not
necessarily in print. They also said that to get
On the subject of PDFs, I read this in the OSX-The Missing Manual.
It says that the PDFs created from the OSX print dialogue are
screen-optimised—that is, they look best on screen, but not necessarily
in print. They also said that to get them to work well in print, you
need to buy Acrobat as y
On Oct 28, 2005, at 10:33 AM, Charles Small wrote:
Hello, I'm happily using Finale 2000c on Mac OS 9.1.
Now I need to be able to save files as PDFs. I'm told that unless I
splurge for a computer running OS X, my only option is GhostScript. So
I've downloaded GhostScript and its companion Ma
Hi Hiro,
Did you send a report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please let them
know, if you haven't already.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homepage.mac.com/djargon
Brooklyn, NY
On 29 Oct 2005, at 5:06 PM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
The bug which deletes partial note entries bit me. Finally!
Ye
The bug which deletes partial note entries bit me. Finally!
Yes, I deserve humiliation.
But, thanks to a few people reported and warned on this list, I
immediately went back to the last saved version, and my loss was quite
minimal. Another thing is I never turn on auto save in any apps in my
li
I'm curious about how others do this. Do you always use layer 1 if
there's no second layer?
For me the only exception is to accomodate ties across barlines (layer
two ties across while layer one ceases). In organ music, you often need
as many as three layers--sometimes all four--to manage tie
I'm afraid I cannot replicate this bug. I'm on Finale 2006 for Windows. Did
you mean subsequent "staves" instead of "systems" maybe? Are those into the same
staff group?
Rafael J
Subject: [Finale] Bug report - Slurs
between layers between systems - 2006PC
Good morning! Just discover
Yes, it is the way to go if you don´t have Mac OS X or Acrobat...
The last version that I remember to have used is 2.8
[Mmmm, don´t you wanna upgrade to Mac OS 9.2.2?]
Javito, (who once promised never to move to Mac OS X ;)
>
> Hello, I'm happily using Finale 2000c on Mac OS 9.1.
> Now I need
On Oct 28, 2005, at 1:38 PM, John Bell wrote:
But layers do not necessarily indicate voices -- they have no inherent
musical meaning at all.
Setting aside how one feels on the general debate about when to use
layers and when to use voices -- and I can certainly see that not
everyone in the
On Oct 28, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Lon Price wrote:
How about in a piano part, where in one measure a note needs to be in
layer 2, but there's no need to do layers in the next measure--all
notes are layer 1. This happens to me all the time when writing piano
music, and so far this bug hasn't bitten
12 matches
Mail list logo
