John Howell wrote:
Can't help with the answer, but in a case like this I suggest that you
tell us whether you are talking about a measured BOW tremolo or a
measured FINGER tremolo. Yes, both exist.
I know both exist, and as far as I know, both measured bow and measured
finger tremolos are
On Mar 1, 2006, at 11:35 PM, Stan Lord wrote:
In that they are a bunch of people singing together, no difference.
Except that, to me, a choir exists on its own. You could go to a
concert and the sole performer is the choir.
A chorus seems to imply, to me, singers which support soloists.
You
On 28.02.2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Biber wrote a very famous Passacaglia for unaccompanied violin, the final part
of the Rosary Sonatas.
There is also one very beautiful Passacaglia in one of the 1681 volume
of violin sonatas (violin and continuo), in my opinion a better piece
than the
Just because I recently research it, this comes to mind immediately:
Antonio Salieri: La Folia Espagna, 26 Variations on the Folia ground
bass. Full Orchestra.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
___
Stan Lord wrote:
In that they are a bunch of people singing together, no difference.
Except that, to me, a choir exists on its own. You could go to a
concert and the sole performer is the choir.
A chorus seems to imply, to me, singers which support soloists.
You wouldn't go to a concert
dc wrote:
Martin Banner écrit:
Is anyone on the list familiar with current rules and regulations
regarding permission to publish a modern performing edition of an
older (several centuries older) music manuscript located in the EU,
particularly in Italian libraries, conservatories, etc? I
At 3/2/2006 04:53 AM, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Mar 1, 2006, at 11:35 PM, Stan Lord wrote:
In that they are a bunch of people singing together, no difference.
Except that, to me, a choir exists on its own. You could go to a
concert and the sole performer is the choir.
A chorus seems to imply,
On Mar 2, 2006, at 2:35 AM, Stan Lord wrote:
In that they are a bunch of people singing together, no difference.
Except that, to me, a choir exists on its own. You could go to a
concert and the sole performer is the choir.
A chorus seems to imply, to me, singers which support soloists.
You
Christopher Smith wrote:
Can we just agree that while each of the two terms seems to be more
popular in certain contexts, there is a fair bit of overlap, both in
meaning and usage?
Christopher
That depends. How do you define overlap, meaning and usage?
;-)
Raymond Horton wrote:
Christopher Smith wrote:
Can we just agree that while each of the two terms seems to be more
popular in certain contexts, there is a fair bit of overlap, both in
meaning and usage?
Christopher
That depends. How do you define overlap, meaning and usage?
;-)
In a message dated 02/03/2006 14:29:17 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did we
ever learn what the meanind of "is" is?
what do you mean by "meanind"?
Lawrence :-)
"þaes
ofereode - þisses swa maeg"http://lawrenceyates.co.ukDulcian
Wind Quintet: http://dulcianwind.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 02/03/2006 14:29:17 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did we ever learn what the meanind of is is?
what do you mean by meanind?
By meanind I mean that I need to take up a collection so that I can
take typing lessons, followed by
On Mar 1, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Lee Actor wrote:
Solo/soli/tutti is standard. Actually, I can't recall ever seeing
sola or
tutte on a viola part. But then, my memory ain't what it used to be.
Stravinsky, e.g., uses the feminine forms all the time.
Basically, it's a question of what you mean
At 8:38 AM +0100 3/1/06, themark wrote:
sorry for leaving the path for a while, what is the difference
between choir and chorus?
thanks
As it happens, this is a question with which I bedevil the students
in my choral literature class. Why? Because while there is no real
difference, there
Bass Drum (Gran Cassa) is also feminine. As are other
percussion instruments.
Unless you're 100% sure, I would probably stick with
masculine forms, especially if you're using English
staff names.
Ryan
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail
There is a long standing, and obviously useful tradition of using
Italian terms to describe and define musical indications, and I
continue to use some of them - ritard and accel. seem more practical
than Slow Down and Speed Up. But I have become increasingly
comfortable with using
I was dinged with this when I was in graduate school by a prefessor who was a
stickler for correct Italian. I resisted his advice.
Personally, I think you should have recourse to an English language dictionary
that you trust. If the word is in there, you certainly may use it without
Italian
!00% with you there! Exactly the difference.
A friend of mine said what about the Hallelujah Chorus? To my mind that is
perfectly correct.
The Chorus is featured in this 'tune', but in the context of the work it is
in support of soloists.
Cheers K in Oz
Keith Helgesen.
Director of Music,
On Mar 1, 2006, at 11:34 PM, John Howell wrote:
saxophone choir (oh ye saxophonophobes!).
I believe the correct term, as used by no other an expert than Homer
Simpson, is saxomaphonophobe. Perhaps in some contexts, like in a
bar, one may use saxomaphobe.
Thank you.
Christopher Smith
In orchestral parts, what's the best way to get the instrument name
to appear as a header or footer on every page (or every other page)?
John
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On Mar 2, 2006, at 4:18 PM, John Bell wrote:
In orchestral parts, what's the best way to get the instrument name to
appear as a header or footer on every page (or every other page)?
Here's a possibility:
In your score, create a text block (or add to the existing one that
presently has
I have a plugin that helps for this: Copyist's Helper.
-Original Message-
From: John Bell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2006 09:18 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] Instrument names
In orchestral parts, what's the best way to get the instrument name
Thanks Christopher
The first method you suggest would be ideal were it not for the
several drawbacks you mention. Regrettably, these make it unusable. I
will examine your other suggestions.
Regards
John
On 2 Mar 2006, at 21:38, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Mar 2, 2006, at 4:18 PM,
Thanks Robert
I looked at this in the past and concluded that it did not do quite
what I wanted. But I'll have another look -- it may be useful to me.
Regards
John
On 2 Mar 2006, at 22:48, Robert Patterson wrote:
I have a plugin that helps for this: Copyist's Helper.
-Original
That can be set directly using the File menu item Extract parts Select
the Options button in the first dx box.. You can set the font, size,
location and pages of the header/footer (doesn't allow just left or right
pages, tho- simply page one or 1 through, etc.)
If this has changed
The trouble with that is that you lose the instrument name in the upper
left-hand corner on Page 1. There is no automated way to have the same
name in one place on Page 1, and someplace else in a smaller typeface
on pages 2 +. You end up typing it all out somewhere else in any case.
Since
I know this has been discussed before, but how fast does Finale 2006 run on
the new Intel-based MacBooks? Faster or slower than on a top-of-the-line
PowerPC-based PowerBook? I thought that Finale was compiled using
CodeWarrior (not XCode) and therefore might have problems.
Brian
27 matches
Mail list logo
