Gerald Berg wrote:
Sorry
Is this in regards to Andrew Stiller?
Jerry
Yes -- his wife posted about a week ago that Andrew was in the hospital.
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailma
Hi jef and Dennis,
One of the motivations for creating MusicXML was to establish an
archival-quality electronic format for common Western music notation
(CWMN). It is a text-based and semantics-based format, which are
essential starting points. But then the software has to evolve to
fully capture
On 14 Sep 2007 at 4:15, Dennis W. Manasco wrote:
> "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I'm shocked that people are so ill-informed that they'd just reject
> >these file formats when the converters are so easily available for
> >so many different versions of Word.
>
> Nuh Uh.
>
>
Thanks Robert !!
Saved again !!
Stan
On 14 Sep 2007, at 17:49, Robert Patterson wrote:
On 9/14/07, Stan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now I've noticed that the repeated measure nos. are also showing on
some of the other staves of the score.
Use these settings:
Beginning with Measure [999
On 9/14/07, Stan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now I've noticed that the repeated measure nos. are also showing on
> some of the other staves of the score.
Use these settings:
Beginning with Measure [999]
[Check] Always Show Last [999]
With multiple parts views in one file, I think you wil
Thanks Aaron,
I got Robert's plugins and was successful with the drum part.
Excellent!!
Now I've noticed that the repeated measure nos. are also showing on
some of the other staves of the score.
I don't have "top staff" checked in the dialogue box, BTW. I try
different settings but can't
Sorry
Is this in regards to Andrew Stiller?
Jerry
Gerald Berg
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
shirling & neueweise wrote, on 9/14/2007 6:56 AM:
although this discussion began with text file format maintenance, and we
are dealing with musical and sound works, many of the basic issues are
similar, so any info related to digital archiving issues, no matter the
milieu, would be appreciated.
It's about assured, accurate and complete readability of the original files.
__In perpetuity.__
as i said, a utopia, but would be interested in hearing from people
who have knowledge or links to offer about digital archiving.
in my work with the canadian electroacoustic community i am worki
__In perpetuity.__
this is a utopic ideal that so far has seen no concrete reality, only
a number of variations on "very long-lasting".
It doesn't matter that "converters" can translate the files today.
What matters is whether the files can be reliably, completely and
accurately read ten
"David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm shocked that people are so ill-informed that they'd just reject
these file formats when the converters are so easily available for
so many different versions of Word.
Nuh Uh.
It's not about "converters."
It's about assured, accurate and comp
11 matches
Mail list logo