In a message dated 10/2/2007 5:22:37 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Johannes Gebauer wrote, on 10/2/2007 4:50 AM:
The best
you could hope for is Fin2k9.
Unfortunately my hopes are really low.
So are mine.
Wait! Even if there is consensus that Fin2k8 is a buggy mess,
Correct, that's why I keep my 2005b FinWin :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
In a message dated 10/2/2007 5:22:37 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Johannes Gebauer wrote, on 10/2/2007 4:50 AM:
The best
you could hope for is Fin2k9.
Unfortunately my hopes are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/2/2007 5:22:37 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Johannes Gebauer wrote, on 10/2/2007 4:50 AM:
The best
you could hope for is Fin2k9.
Unfortunately my hopes are really low.
So are mine.
Wait! Even if there is consensus that
On 03.10.2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wait! Even if there is consensus that Fin2k8 is a buggy mess, why isn't the
obvious alternative an earlier version of Finale?
2k8 may be the worst, but earlier versions were already pretty bad imo.
I am staying with 2k7 for the moment, and I actually
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need this, then?
http://maltedmedia.com/images/finale/touburg-test.jpg
Add an A to the upper staff. Then the B will be in the right place, and
the A will entirely overlap the A moved from the lower staff.
Hope it's what you need.
Dennis, it's amazing that the
Wouldn't the proper equation be: time saved using existing Finale skills
minus time saved not having to learn a new program? That should give
you a plus or
minus sign at the end. What am I missing here?
--David Lawrence
Only the fact that there will inevitably be a negative value for any
Well, I apologize for south African English and for causing a big
misunderstanding.
There are millions of fly's out there but I got the one that is bothering
me
Just a common saying. I got a 2006c and was wondering whether or not to
spend money again.
I just took the chance to work with 2007 at
Okay, I was misunderstanding.
My sincere apologies for the unwarranted accusation.
I think the answer you were looking for was given subsequently. If
not, write back and I will happily supply it.
Regards,
Christopher
On 3-Oct-07, at 3:57 PM, Andrew Noah Cap wrote:
Well, I apologize for
I was curious what Sibelius support would say if I said the only thing
keeping me from switching to Sibelius was a body of work I have which is
based on Bill Duncan's templates.
Below is the exchange.
So, for now, I'll have to stay with FinMac 2007c.
**Leigh
Hi,
I don't think this will be
This doesn't seem right to me. The whole point of Bill's chord fonts
is that they do not require any fancy spacing or formatting. You can
type the chord suffixes directly in a word processor and they look
fine, so I have no idea why Sibelius couldn't handle them. Hell, you
should even
Arg, I guess we will have to suffer with Finale
Hopefully they will fix things...*trying to keep a straight
facecan'tdo.it*
Leigh Daniels wrote:
I was curious what Sibelius support would say if I said the only thing
keeping me from switching to Sibelius was a body
Darcy,
If you can get it to work, a lot of people will love you even more than
we already do!
I'm guessing it's probably a limitation of MusicXML interpretation in
Sibelius. I used Dolet 4.0.1 to export to XML.
Oh well. FinMac07c is still better than an Osmiroid and white-out!
**Leigh
On Wed,
Try contacting the Yahoo Sibelius list at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sibelius-list/ and the and the
Sibelius help forum at
http://www.sibelius.com/cgi-bin/helpcenter/chat/chat.pl?groupid=3guest=1
Both of these lists are populated by some very experienced users and
monitored by some
13 matches
Mail list logo
