On Oct 3, 2009, at 2:24 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Finale *users*, on the other hand, can get off the treadmill any time
they want. I've for years argued that the knee-jerk upgrade is silly,
except for the pro engravers who need to keep up with the current
version and need to exchange files
On 4 Oct 2009 at 8:17, Aaron Sherber wrote:
On 10/3/2009 10:08 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On the other hand, for those of us who do our engraving gratis,
there's no amount of hours saved multiplied by an hourly rate of $0
that will offset the upgrade price.
Actually, you're looking at
On 4 Oct 2009 at 9:30, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Phil Daley p_da...@tds.net wrote:
I agree with David. I only work for my own purposes (both choirs and
instrumental groups) and can't afford the upgrade prices.
That's why I am still using V 3.7.2. Meets my
Its not so much of WOULD I want to run an OS 9 program, but rather, I
can't. I have no more machines that run OS 9. And I don't regret that
at all. I don't want to still be carrying around a 1991 GSM mobile
phone because it still works. Same for Finale. I paid for an upgrade
to be able to run on
On 4 Oct 2009 at 12:49, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Its not so much of WOULD I want to run an OS 9 program, but rather, I
can't. I have no more machines that run OS 9. And I don't regret that
at all.
The only significant word in your three sentences is *I*.
Phil *does* want to run the old
goddammit!! i had read the version history and not the main page,
so i thought 2.45b was the latest version. hooley,
thanks!
You need the latest version of TGTools that's compatible with expressions in
Finale 2009. Sounds like you're using an older version.
(grumblegrumblegrumblegrumblegrumblegrumble)
new version of TGTools works as expected...
fuu-cryinoutloud. man, i just finished most of the
work i needed it for ARGH!!!
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
shirling neueweise wrote:
(grumblegrumblegrumblegrumblegrumblegrumble)
new version of TGTools works as expected...
fuu-cryinoutloud. man, i just finished most of the work
i needed it for ARGH!!!
Murphy watches out for us all.
cd
--
for some reason, cmd-ctl top pull up the menu isn't working, is this
a bug? i'm trying to hide score-specific titles in the parts and
what worked in 2008 is not working for me here.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
The override key doesn't work on the contextual menus in Fin2009 and
2010.
I hate it too.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
djar...@earthlink.net
Brooklyn, NY
On 4 Oct 2009, at 5:56 PM, shirling neueweise wrote:
for some reason, cmd-ctl top pull up the menu isn't working, is this
a bug? i'm
On Sat Oct 3, at SaturdayOct 3 9:47 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
Do you see Charles there in Montreal? Please give him our best.
He's my neighbour! I see him, his wife and his adorable young
daughter quite often. I will say hi from you two.
I work with Barry Harris from time to time
jesus christ, they took an already not-entirely-functional tool and
made it worse?!?!
how do you get around it? and any related things i might not have
come across yet?
The override key doesn't work on the contextual menus in Fin2009 and 2010.
I hate it too.
manual sez it should
The override key doesn't work on the contextual menus in Fin2009 and 2010.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
it used to be possible to click on systems and have the edit box show
the margins etc. of the selection... when i od this now, it works for
the 1st time, then it doesn't work (unless i switch tools and
back!!!), or clicking anywhere gives me the edit box for system 5?!?!
jesus, this is spectacular, i can't insert a page break wityhout
switching out of the page layout tool and giong back, if i have
edited ant system margins...
it used to be possible to click on systems and have the edit box
show the margins etc. of the selection... when i od this now, it
No no, these are all IMPROVEMENTS that MakeMusic has put into Finale
2010. They did extensive testing with it's user base on this.
;-)
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 3:45 PM, shirling neueweise
shirl...@newmusicnotation.com wrote:
jesus, this is spectacular, i can't insert a page break wityhout
Thanks to all of you for your posts on Finale 2010, with and without
Mac Snow Leopard. Thanks to all of the reported problems, I've decided
to stay put with Finale 2008 (took me years to upgrade to that from
Finale 2003) and Mac OSx.5.8.
Martin
Martin Banner
mban...@hvc.rr.com
Really? Wow. I updated my 2006 iMac with 10.6 and I notice a
difference in speed of the machine, and in Finale 2007. And I haven't
had any issues with it so far.
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Martin Banner mban...@hvc.rr.com wrote:
Thanks to all of you for your posts on Finale 2010, with and
this is nuts. to take advantage of the categories (which i must say
i find absolutely spectacular) you can only assign an expression to
score or score and parts, and you can/t force it to appear on for
example, the top of the violin I stave in the score without creating
a new identical
I've seen some crazy dynamic markings, but pf is a new one
to me!
mdl
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
man holy crap, let me add my voice to that, i am really smashing my
head against the wall here with 2010, but was able to at least work
in 2008. 2010 is seriously screwing me for an upcoming deadline.
since i am unfamiliar as i should be with 2010 i would have done this
job in 2008, if it
I've seen some crazy dynamic markings, but pf is a new one to me!
hey man, it's called new music (yuk yuk yuk)
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Mark D Lew wrote:
I've seen some crazy dynamic markings, but pf is a new one to me!
I've run across it in performance, but it's kind of messy!
:o
cd
--
http://www.livejournal.com/users/dershem/#
http://members.cox.net/dershem
___
Finale
no jef, staff list is available through positioning section of the
categories, yeah yeah yeah. look before you scream 8-)
this is nuts. to take advantage of the categories (which i must say
i find absolutely spectacular) you can only assign an expression to
score or score and parts, and
so...
cmd-sh-h hides in all when in score or part
cmd-opt-sh-h hides in current part when in part
cmd-opt-sh-h hides in all when in score (here is the error?)
cmd-sh-h makes text hidden in all when in score if text block is hidden
cmd-sh-h does nothing when in part if text block is hidden
ah! one solution, drag the SC text off page, THEN unlink it and drag
it back onto the score page. this also solves the problem of frames
not being hidden in parts that belong to unshown text.
yeah!
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
I have a tune in A major (3 sharps). The alto sax part is in F# (6 sharps). I'd
like to put the alto part in 6 flats instead. Simplify Key is already checked
in the staff attributes dialogue, but that doesn't affect a 6-symbol key
signature.
Is there an easy way to get what I want? I've tried
27 matches
Mail list logo
