timothy.price wrote:
On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
reversing the mouthpiece *definitely*
does.
As radical an idea as actual experimentation may be, I tried it on my
trumpet, and by gosh, you get a much louder sound
using the reversed mouthpiece. Imagine that !
At 10:58 AM -0400 3/15/10, dhbailey wrote:
timothy.price wrote:
As radical an idea as actual experimentation
may be, I tried it on my trumpet, and by gosh,
you get a much louder sound
using the reversed mouthpiece. Imagine that !
But you also get a different timbre, so it's a
trade off
John Howell wrote:
At 10:58 AM -0400 3/15/10, dhbailey wrote:
timothy.price wrote:
As radical an idea as actual experimentation may be, I tried it on
my trumpet, and by gosh, you get a much louder sound
using the reversed mouthpiece. Imagine that !
But you also get a different timbre, so
Yeah, I just tried to go Ta-ka-da, ta-ka-da with my tongue in my
cheek ... came out sounding something like a rat going down a sewer
pipe ...
Dean
On Mar 15, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Ray Horton wrote:
John Howell wrote:
(Sorry; tongue very definitely in cheek--and it's hard to triple-
John, I believe instrumental technique has always advanced as
composers write dumb/difficult/impossible things and players get them
to work. It's a two-way street, though. Taafe-Zwillich wrote a bass
trombone concerto that over-uses the stupid pet tricks of Charlie
Vernon;-)
Sent from my iPod
Interestingly enough the piece for which I am considering this effect has 1
D-trumpet (or E-flat if the player prefers) and 2 fluegelhorns. We'll see if I
wind up giveng the effect to any or all of them.
ajr
John Howell john.how...@vt.edu wrote:
At 10:58 AM -0400 3/15/10, dhbailey
John Howell wrote:
At 10:58 AM -0400 3/15/10, dhbailey wrote:
timothy.price wrote:
As radical an idea as actual experimentation may be, I tried it on my
trumpet, and by gosh, you get a much louder sound
using the reversed mouthpiece. Imagine that !
But you also get a different timbre, so
My 9-yr.-old browsers no longer support most online video, notably
UTube. I'd like to upgrade to the most recent available versions that
will run w. my OS (Mac OS 10.3.9), but can't find these on the
internet. Can anybody help?
My current browsers are Safari 1.3.2 and IE/Mac 5.2
Andrew
I was asked to restate the merging situation.
First - thanks for the answers! Noel S.' long one has been printed
to study...
Obviously merging is not simple, though my case is about as simple
as it could get.
Score for viola piano; 2 movements. I want to merge mvts. 1 2
of the
I have two computers, one which runs OS 10.3.9, so I can still use my
Finale 2003 and Microsoft Works files. Can't access either of those on
my new iMac that runs 10.5.x
Martin
On Mar 15, 2010, at 3:48 PM, J D Thomas wrote:
Andrew, is there a specific reason why you're still at Mac OS
I agree that it would probably be good to update your OS, but if you don't
wish to you should be able to update Safari. Under your Apple menu just
choose Software Update. Software Update will check for updates for all the
Apple software on your machine and the Safari update should be in the list
Hi Andrew,
YouTube (and most other online video) is Flash-based. You will need to download
the latest version of Flash for your OS, which you can probably do from Adobe's
website.
(You may also need to upgrade your browser, but you will definitely need to
install Flash.)
Internet Explorer
On 15 Mar 2010 at 16:31, Martin Banner wrote:
I have two computers, one which runs OS 10.3.9, so I can still use my
Finale 2003 and Microsoft Works files. Can't access either of those on
my new iMac that runs 10.5.x
Is there no possibility on OS X of running an earlier version of OS X
Hi Katherine. If you have Adobe Acrobat (which has a good file-combining tool)
you could always merge pdf's of the movements (?)
Best regards, Mark Houghton
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of Katherine
Hoover
Hi Andrew-
According to this, you have the latest version ot Safari(1.3.2) that
works on 10.3.9
(Safari 2.0 requires OS 10.4.)
http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/17743vid=132387
--
As far as IE for Mac, according to this, Version 5.2.3, June 16,
2003 , was the
Hi David,
It's possible, but unsupported and not for the faint of heart. The process is
essentially the same as running a Hackintosh -- i.e., running Mac OS X on a
PC:
http://wiki.osx86project.org/wiki/index.php/Vmware_how_to
It is, ironically, much easier to run Windows on a Mac using
On 15 Mar 2010 at 18:03, Darcy James Argue wrote:
It's possible, but unsupported and not for the faint of heart. The process
is essentially the same as running a Hackintosh -- i.e., running Mac OS
X on a PC:
http://wiki.osx86project.org/wiki/index.php/Vmware_how_to
I wasn't really thinking
Hi David,
Well, yes, Apple have a clear financial incentive to try to, ahem, encourage
people to upgrade their hardware.
Also, each time a new Mac model comes out, it is usually incapable of running
*any* version of the OS that predates that hardware. For instance, I haven't
looked into it,
On 15 Mar 2010 at 18:36, Darcy James Argue wrote:
I did discover PearPC, a PPC emulator that is capable of running OS X 10.3
as a client OS (with some caveats).
http://pearpc.sourceforge.net/about.html
That looks promising -- one could get a new PC with the latest OS X
and use this
You could just half-depress the valves (this obviously doesn't work for
trombones).
Michael Lawlor
- Original Message -
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:24:24 -0400
From: timothy.price timothy.pr...@valley.net
Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: blowing air through brass instruments
To:
Well ... most Trbs.
Dean
On Mar 15, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Michael Lawlor wrote:
You could just half-depress the valves (this obviously doesn't work
for trombones).
Michael Lawlor
- Original Message -
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:24:24 -0400
From: timothy.price
I did this, in Finale 2005, with a couple of Baroque transcriptions for
brass quintet which had three to five movements in a separate files. It's
been awhile, but if I remember correctly, I merged the multiple movements
into one large file by adding a measure to the end of the first movement,
22 matches
Mail list logo
