> Obviously, the notation product is a very long way off and there are no
> examples to
> show yet, but here's the first blog post by Daniel Spreadbury announcing the
> project:
>
> http://blog.steinberg.net/2013/02/welcome/
If Daniel is associated with the project, then I am optimistic (Now, i
> (Now, if he could only get me off the Igor Noteheads mailing list, then he
> would be a true hero!)
Me too!
Four years into daily Finale use I still hit things that were far quicker in
Igor.
Basic thinks like slur entry, dynamic entry, hairpin entry, proper linked parts,
ability to grab anyt
On 2013-02-21 14:02, Steve Parker wrote:
> It is to be hoped that Steinberg take a look at Igor.
...or they could try to be really innovative for a change? Although Igor
went much further than anything else in terms of innovative thinking,
Igor was still just a variation on the same theme. IMO,
When Igor came out it was entirely different. New features in fairly recent
versions of Finale and Sibelius were present at the start of Igor more than a
decade ahead of its time.
Can you explain more the direction you're thinking?
Modeless operation; ability to easily enter dynamics, slurs, mar
On 2013-02-21 15:33, Steve Parker wrote:
> Can you explain more the direction you're thinking?
Just some examples:
* Some Finale users thought Sibelius 7 was a good choice just because it
now had an input mode where the duration/pitch entry sequence was
reversed. Why should such things even be
>Fortunately, there is an All Notes Off command in the MIDI/Audio menu.
Hmmm. That command isn't doing anything for me to alleviate the problem I'm
having. The only thing that works is exiting/re-entering the speedy editing
frame. And it's enough of a hassle to cause me to consider setting up a
d
