Re: [Finale] 20th century notations (was Tremolos)

2006-06-27 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jun 24, 2006, at 6:02 PM, John Howell wrote: At 4:12 PM -0400 6/24/06, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: At 02:14 PM 6/24/06 -0400, John Howell wrote: And let's not forget that the development of non-traditional notations in the 20th century was driven by one and only one non-musical

Re: [Finale] 20th century notations (was Tremolos)

2006-06-27 Thread John Howell
At 5:32 PM -0400 6/27/06, Andrew Stiller wrote: On Jun 24, 2006, at 6:02 PM, John Howell wrote: At 4:12 PM -0400 6/24/06, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: At 02:14 PM 6/24/06 -0400, John Howell wrote: And let's not forget that the development of non-traditional notations in the 20th century was

RE: [Finale] 20th century notations (was Tremolos)

2006-06-27 Thread Owain Sutton
Did Cowell's The Banshee exist in conventional notation? I'm pretty sure it's written in conventional notation, with just a few additional symbols to indicate how to play particular passages. This is based on twenty minutes with a pianist friend who was experimenting with the piece, and

Re: [Finale] 20th century notations (was Tremolos)

2006-06-24 Thread John Howell
At 4:12 PM -0400 6/24/06, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: At 02:14 PM 6/24/06 -0400, John Howell wrote: And let's not forget that the development of non-traditional notations in the 20th century was driven by one and only one non-musical requirement: music could not be copyrighted unless it could

RE: [Finale] 20th century notations (was Tremolos)

2006-06-24 Thread Owain Sutton
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Howell Sent: 24 June 2006 23:03 To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] 20th century notations (was Tremolos) At 4:12 PM -0400 6/24/06, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: At 02:14 PM 6/24/06