Re: [Finale] EPS question clarified

2005-12-28 Thread Kurt Gnos
And PDF (the Adobe version) brings the benefit to print postscript quality on all printers... Kurt At 00:50 29.12.2005, you wrote: I don't mind reading this David. Welcome back. It is a good precis of the information it has taken me a couple of days to fully understand, simple as it is. May

Re: [Finale] EPS question clarified

2005-12-28 Thread Chuck Israels
I don't mind reading this David. Welcome back. It is a good precis of the information it has taken me a couple of days to fully understand, simple as it is. Maybe the name "Encapsulated PostScript" should have given me a clue. Duh! Never mind, I've ordered Adobe Acrobat (at an academic

Re: [Finale] EPS question clarified

2005-12-28 Thread dhbailey
I didn't see anybody mention this, but then I didn't read every word of every response (I've been away for the past 5 days): EPS are postscript graphics -- they'll print fine on postscript printers but on non-postscript printers they'll only print as the embedded screen-resolution TIFF graphic

[Finale] EPS question clarified

2005-12-28 Thread Chuck Israels
Hi all, Apparently, this EPS issue is an MS Word problem, not Finale, or the OS, or EPS in general. A friend here processed the file in Adobe Distiller, and the resulting pdf looks fine. People with PS printers were able to print from Word without a problem, but others got rasterized gr