At 11:45 PM 12/5/04 +0100, Daniel Wolf wrote:
>Does anyone know the status of Graphire Music Press? The Graphire domain
>is expired.
I don't know either, Daniel. I live about 55 miles from Alan. We did not
part on the greatest of terms, but I could call him if everyone with
Graphire is really des
Daniel Wolf wrote:
Does anyone know the status of Graphire Music Press? The Graphire domain
is expired.
I was visiting the Graphire site just a couple of weeks ago. Nothing
seemed to have been updated there for a very long time. There were no
discussion forum, just a mailing list for registered
Does anyone know the status of Graphire Music Press? The Graphire domain
is expired.
Daniel Wolf
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On Nov 21, 2004, at 12:46 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
So you are allowed to make changes to copyrighted material without the
permission from the copyright holder?
If you have a legally owned copy of the original, and your altered copy
is for personal use only and neither publicly displayed nor di
At 09:46 AM 11/21/04 +0100, Jari Williamsson wrote:
>Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
>
>> Isn't allowed? If it's HTML, you just make the changes.
> > There's no PDF nanny.
>
>So you are allowed to make changes to copyrighted material without the
>permission from the copyright holder?
>Also, section #
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
Isn't allowed? If it's HTML, you just make the changes.
> There's no PDF nanny.
So you are allowed to make changes to copyrighted material without the
permission from the copyright holder?
Also, section #3 in the Finale license agreement says "...you may not
adapt or
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
To add to the rhetoricals & hypotheticals... How do you make notes in your
manual?
I don't. And I wouldn't either in html. Simply, because it's far to
complicated.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
_
At 02:41 PM 11/20/04 +0100, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
>True, but I don't want to change them either. In fact I doN't think MM
>would even consider making html manuals, if this was the only reason for
>having them.
Since this started as a hypothetical, I'll leave MM way out of it. :)
To add to
d. collins wrote:
Johannes Gebauer écrit:
Without really wanting to take sides on this, I would like to note
that I have various user manuals in electronic form, both in PDF and
HTML formats. My personal preference is definitely PDF. I find this
much easier to handle when searching for certain w
True, but I don't want to change them either. In fact I doN't think MM
would even consider making html manuals, if this was the only reason for
having them.
YMMV,
Johannes
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 11:24 AM 11/20/04 +0100, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
What was the disadvantage of PDF manuals aga
Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Jari's responded to my proposal of converting the Finale user manual
from ~.pdf to ~.htm format by writing
That means you have to have some kind of search engine on your
computer, which is not the case for everyone.
Acrobat Search is available in Acrobat Reader.
to whi
At 09:03 AM 11/20/04 +0100, Jari Williamsson wrote:
>The only thing that isn't easy to do is to make additions/corrections to
>the existing pages in the on-line manual (but that isn't probably
>allowed anyway, so...).
Isn't allowed? If it's HTML, you just make the changes. There's no PDF nanny.
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 09:41 PM 11/19/04 -0600, you wrote:
that the user's manual / on-line documentation, instead of in ~.pdf
format, was in HTML. Bane or blessing?
As one who created several HTML software manuals, I can say PLEASE put the
manual in HTML format and dump the PDF. PDF is
Well, I have other priorities, I must admit, I'd rather have them fix
EPS for example. I, for one, do not need, nor want a HTML manual. It
would be completely useless to me. I really do not see any advantage in
having both.
Johannes
d. collins wrote:
Johannes Gebauer écrit:
Without really wanti
As an experiment, using Acrobat Professional 6.0 I saved the Finale User
Manual Index as an HTML file. The result, unfortunately, was far less than
useful. Line feeds in the pdf document (not surprisingly) were not respected
in HTML. The internal Acrobat cross references were lost too. For example,
Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
>What prompted
> me to consider the idea, was observing that a manual for another
> package, which was longer than the Finale User manual, with about the
> same number of links, loaded the browser and the manual much more
> quickly than the user manual loads in Finale.
>
>
At 9:41 pm -0600 11/19/04, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
that the user's manual / on-line documentation, instead of in ~.pdf
format, was in HTML. Bane or blessing?
Please ... NO !
My response to this is right out of a 1930s vampire movie: I hold my
cross up to the monster, avert my eyes and pray.
PD
Without really wanting to take sides on this, I would like to note that
I have various user manuals in electronic form, both in PDF and HTML
formats. My personal preference is definitely PDF. I find this much
easier to handle when searching for certain words, and I prefer to have
something in a
Jari's responded to my proposal of converting the Finale user manual
from ~.pdf to ~.htm format by writing
That means you have to have some kind of search engine on your
computer, which is not the case for everyone.
Acrobat Search is available in Acrobat Reader.
to which Dennis responded
Yes,
d. collins wrote:
That means you have to have some kind of search engine on your computer,
which is not the case for everyone.
Acrobat Search is available in Acrobat Reader.
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 09:41 PM 11/19/04 -0600, you wrote:
that the user's manual / on-line documentation, instead of in ~.pdf
format, was in HTML. Bane or blessing?
As one who created several HTML software manuals, I can say PLEASE put the
manual in HTML format and dump the PDF. PDF is
At 09:41 PM 11/19/04 -0600, you wrote:
>that the user's manual / on-line documentation, instead of in ~.pdf
>format, was in HTML. Bane or blessing?
As one who created several HTML software manuals, I can say PLEASE put the
manual in HTML format and dump the PDF. PDF is pretty but inflexible. In
...friends
that the user's manual / on-line documentation, instead of in ~.pdf
format, was in HTML. Bane or blessing?
ns
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
23 matches
Mail list logo
