oder apfelinista?
There's only two kind of people in this wolrd: those who are Mac users
and those who want to become a Mac user :-)
GR
Andrew Stiller wrote:
On Apr 7, 2005, at 2:52 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 07 Apr 2005, at 2:29 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
Well, we
On Apr 8, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
On Apr 7, 2005, at 2:52 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 07 Apr 2005, at 2:29 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
Well, we Mackers ...
Oh dear, I never thought I would consider myself a Macker, which in
German means something in betw
Andrew Stiller schrieb:
RE German "Macker"--cf, perhaps, British "wanker?"
Can't think of an appropriate Americanism...
No, a wanker is definitely worse.
A common usage is this: "Das ist ihr Macker", that's her (a girl's)
"Macker", for "the guy she sleeps with, who is a bit of an idiot".
Johannes
On Apr 7, 2005, at 2:52 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 07 Apr 2005, at 2:29 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
Well, we Mackers ...
Oh dear, I never thought I would consider myself a Macker, which in
German means something in between having a screw loose and being an
a$%hole.
O
On Apr 7, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On Apr 7, 2005 2:24 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
This change in WinXP is a massive stupidity, with absolute no
logical justification, except Microsoft's continuing
incomprehension of why the Mac UI i
Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
Interesting... the LEO English-German dictionary translates "Macker"
only as "bloke," "fellow," or "guy:" http://tinyurl.com/7xb8l
That's a pretty mild way of translating it, considering the root of the
word is "Macke", and someone who has a "Macke" literally has a screw
l
On 07 Apr 2005, at 3:54 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
And don't get me started on the 1-button mouse!
That's just what Apple happens to ship with its computers. OS X
natively supports all standard 3-button scrolling mice, without the
need for any third-party drivers.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 7 Apr 2005 at 16:21, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
> David W. Fenton / 05.4.7 / 03:54 PM wrote:
>
> >Well, while I criticize MS for never really getting the Mac UI when
> >they copy surface features of it, the dogma of the mouse on the Mac
> >is even more ridiculous. I know that the studies show that m
On 7 Apr 2005 at 16:27, Darcy James Argue wrote:
> On 07 Apr 2005, at 3:54 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> > And don't get me started on the 1-button mouse!
>
> That's just what Apple happens to ship with its computers. OS X
> natively supports all standard 3-button scrolling mice, without the
>
On 7 Apr 2005 at 5:24, Christopher Smith wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
> >
> > This change in WinXP is a massive stupidity, with absolute no
> > logical justification, except Microsoft's continuing incomprehension
> > of why the Mac UI is superior to their own.
>
> A
On 07 Apr 2005, at 2:29 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
Well, we Mackers ...
Oh dear, I never thought I would consider myself a Macker, which in
German means something in between having a screw loose and being an
a$%hole.
Oh well.
I believe the preferred term for Apple comput
On Apr 7, 2005 11:29 AM, Johannes Gebauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
> > Well, we Mackers ...
>
> Oh dear, I never thought I would consider myself a Macker, which in
> German means something in between having a screw loose and being an
> a$%hole.
>
> Oh well.
Interesting
Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
Well, we Mackers ...
Oh dear, I never thought I would consider myself a Macker, which in
German means something in between having a screw loose and being an a$%hole.
Oh well.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
On Apr 7, 2005 2:24 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
>> This change in WinXP is a massive stupidity, with absolute no
>> logical justification, except Microsoft's continuing
>> incomprehension of why the Mac UI is superior to their own.
>
> At le
On Apr 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
This change in WinXP is a massive stupidity, with absolute no logical
justification, except Microsoft's continuing incomprehension of why
the Mac UI is superior to their own.
At least youse guys HAVE alt-key navigation that is usable. 8-(
Christoph
On 7 Apr 2005 at 6:51, keith helgesen wrote:
> One hiccup, my main menu bar File, Edit, View, Options etc, does not
> show Key Letters underlined.
>
> Most are pretty obvious, but some not so- to give one example, M for
> Midi- or M for Mass Mover. (I discovered its M for Mass Mover, but it
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bernard Nussbaumer
Sent: Thursday, 7 April 2005 7:09
AM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Letter
shortcuts.
Don't
they appear when pressing the Alt-key?
Bernard
On Apr 6, 2005 10:51
PM, keith helgesen &l
Don't they appear when pressing the Alt-key?
BernardOn Apr 6, 2005 10:51 PM, keith helgesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After following a recent thread I discovered the joy using "Alt
va" for Show Active Layer etc
.
A bit of experimentation has opened up a huge Pandora's
Box for m
After following a recent thread I discovered the joy using “Alt
va” for Show Active Layer etc
.
A bit of experimentation has opened up a huge Pandora’s
Box for me. Clear entry, extract parts, change note size etc etc.
One hiccup, my main menu bar – File, Edit, View,
Options etc, does
19 matches
Mail list logo
