On 27 Apr 2005 at 14:14, Guy Hayden wrote:
> My sainted grandmother used to say, "Profferd advice stinks!"
Asking other people to change the subjects of their email messages to
fix a problem on your end seems self-centered to me.
You should complain to your ISP to see if they can fix it.
I kno
On Apr 26, 2005, at 4:53 PM, Guy Hayden wrote:
The anti-spam function on my ISP blocks any message with "Spam" in the
subject line.
Some programs (Norton Anti-Spam, for example) add a spamers address to
the users blocked senders list.
I have had to manually remove almost a dozen of you from my
> I am certain I am not the only user who is experiencing some
> difficultly because other users do not wish to be considerate of a
> simple and not unrealistic request.
Okay, without getting shirty, can you answer this one question just so I'm
clear.
Can you change the prefixing to something li
Wednesday, April 27, 2005 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Maestoso spiced meat in a can
If you can configure your spam catcher to put something around the
"SPAM" indicator, like brackets or asterisks, then you can filter on
that and never have the problem you've experienced this week.
On 27 Apr 2005 at 12:17, Guy Hayden wrote:
> Well, that's not the way it works. First the filters identify a
> potential spam message. Then, for ease of identity it adds the word
> SPAM to the subject line. I have my own options set to send anything
> with the word SPAM into a special junk mail
Well, that's not the way it works. First the filters identify a potential
spam message. Then, for ease of identity it adds the word SPAM to the
subject line. I have my own options set to send anything with the word SPAM
into a special junk mail folder.
Actually, I do not usually have much pr
On Tue Apr 26 17:01:22 CDT 2005, Guy Hayden wrote:
> That is not one of the criteria.
>
> The way it works is that when a message arrives that seems like
> spam, the both software programs add "Spam" to the subject line
> and send the message to a separate folder where I can review it
> before de
this beginning to sound like the Dead Parrot sketch?
Guy Hayden
- Original Message -
From: "Darcy James Argue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Maestoso spiced meat in a can
Well, Guy, I'm sorry, but I gotta say,
worry about moving you FROM the BLOCKED list to the ALLOWED list.
Unsophisticated indeed! Harrumph!
Guy Hayden
- Original Message - From: "Brad Beyenhof"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Finale"
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Maestoso spi
On 4/26/05, Guy Hayden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I am sorry that I ever mentioned it!
[snip]
> If you want to send out messages that say "SPAM" in the subject line
> then go ahead!
>
> I will just allow my software(s) to put you in the SPAM folder and not
> worry about moving you FROM th
> It is not necessary to flame me because [...]
Lol. There wan't any flaming.
Usually spam programs make the spam prefix something like "[Spam]" rather than
just the word "Spam" - that just bans anyone from talking about spam when
"[Spam]" wouldn't. Now don't take it as a personal afront, but
Unsophisticated indeed! Harrumph!
Guy Hayden
- Original Message - From: "Brad Beyenhof"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Finale"
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Maestoso spiced meat in a can
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:16:58 +0100 Simon Troup
On 26 Apr 2005 at 18:01, Guy Hayden wrote:
> The way it works is that when a message arrives that seems like spam,
> the both software programs add "Spam" to the subject line and send the
> message to a separate folder where I can review it before deleting it.
> It is this addition of "Spam" that
LOWED list.
Unsophisticated indeed! Harrumph!
Guy Hayden
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Beyenhof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Finale"
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Maestoso spiced meat in a can
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:16:58 +0100 Simon Troup w
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:16:58 +0100 Simon Troup wrote:
>> Please change the subject line of this message string before you
>> send out a response!
>
> Sorry about that.
There's no need to apologize. A spam filter that automatically labels
messages with "Spam" in the subject as such is the most ut
From: "Christopher Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Maestoso spiced meat in a can
That seems like an odd criteria. Why would REAL spammers label their stuff
clearly in the subject line?
Christopher
_
On Apr 26, 2005, at 4:53 PM, Guy Hayden wrote:
Ladies and gentlemen:
Please change the subject line of this message string before you send
out a response!
The anti-spam function on my ISP blocks any message with "Spam" in the
subject line.
That seems like an odd criteria. Why would REAL spammer
> Please change the subject line of this message string before you send
> out a response!
Sorry about that.
I'm not sure where I stand on this issue now. I know several participating
members post harmless self promotional messages from time to time, such as gigs
they're doing or pieces that are
Ladies and gentlemen:
Please change the subject line of this message string before you send out a
response!
The anti-spam function on my ISP blocks any message with "Spam" in the
subject line.
Some programs (Norton Anti-Spam, for example) add a spamers address to the
users blocked senders list
19 matches
Mail list logo
