Re: [Finale] OT: partitioning advice needed

2004-04-27 Thread Andrew Stiller
Thanks to all who replied to my query. On the basis of what's been said, I've decided to forego partitioning right now and see what TechTool Pro 4 will do. I confess to some dubiety because I used to have TechTool Pro 2, and found it very bad at, e.g., recovering an accidentally-deleted file.

Re: [Finale] OT: partitioning advice needed

2004-04-23 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 23 Apr 2004, at 03:24 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: Was that Firewire glitch with the Jaguar update an unusual kind of glitch? That is, is Firewire really reliable? Yes, and yes. (And IIRC, the [quickly resolved] glitch only affected FW800 drives, not the first-gen FW400 drives, which is what An

Re: [Finale] OT: partitioning advice needed

2004-04-23 Thread David W. Fenton
On 23 Apr 2004 at 15:10, Darcy James Argue wrote: > On 23 Apr 2004, at 03:04 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: > > > Is it possible on a Mac to install an additional fresh new hard > > drive, make the old hard drive a slave, and then install your OS's > > onto the new drive, but retaining your entire ol

Re: [Finale] OT: partitioning advice needed

2004-04-23 Thread Darcy James Argue
Andrew, IIRC, your problem was caused by the use of disk utilities that were incompatible with your system (Norton Utilities, I think?) not the lack of partitioning itself. Personally, I've had absolutely no trouble using TechTool Pro 4 to repair both OS X and OS 9 volumes. If you haven't tr

Re: [Finale] OT: partitioning advice needed

2004-04-23 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 23.04.2004 19:25 Uhr, Andrew Stiller wrote > I have found otherwise, the hard way, to my sorrow. Both the System 9 > and OSX sides of my computer report damaged files and/or catalogs > resulting from the use of repair utilities on the other side--that > is, repairing System 9 causes damage to

Re: [Finale] OT: partitioning advice needed

2004-04-23 Thread Andrew Stiller
Hi Andrew, It is actually less and less necessary to have separate partitions for OS X and OS 9. In fact, if I were you, I wouldn't bother. You can keep your working OS 9 folder and create a second, clean OS 9 System Folder that you use exclusively for Classic -- without partitioning. - Dar

Re: [Finale] OT: partitioning advice needed

2004-04-22 Thread Philip Aker
On Thursday, Apr 22, 2004, at 11:28 US/Pacific, Andrew Stiller wrote: ... Then there's all those invisible files that can't be backed up because they can't be selected. (I know, I know: make 'em visible w. Res Edit, move 'em around, then make them invisible again. Feh!) You should be using Toggl

Re: [Finale] OT: partitioning advice needed

2004-04-22 Thread Darcy James Argue
Hi Andrew, It is actually less and less necessary to have separate partitions for OS X and OS 9. In fact, if I were you, I wouldn't bother. You can keep your working OS 9 folder and create a second, clean OS 9 System Folder that you use exclusively for Classic -- without partitioning. I hap

[Finale] OT: partitioning advice needed

2004-04-22 Thread Andrew Stiller
Well, it's finally time for me to partition my dual-boot iMac to keep OSS9 & X from interfering w. each other. Never having done it before, I hadn't realized this entailed erasing my whole hard drive (and I confess I don't understand why this must be). _Mac OSX: The Missing Manual_ casually tel