Re: [Finale] RE: [Olist] Sibelius/Finale question (Eek, I opened a can of worms)

2006-05-04 Thread Christopher Smith
On May 3, 2006, at 7:01 PM, Owain Sutton wrote: 'Beat-attached' expressions. Already there and always has been, at least since v3.0. Having read the replies, I still don't get it. It's not there in the Expression Designer (unless it's an anonymous default option or summat). It's ther

Re: [Finale] RE: [Olist] Sibelius/Finale question (Eek, I opened a can of worms)

2006-05-03 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Bill Duncan's Finale fonts has this, and it is a piece of cake to use Owain Sutton wrote: Time signature options to easily create large numbers across several staves, or above systems. You'll need a special font for this, but it IS doable; many listers do this kind of thing in almost e

Re: [Finale] RE: [Olist] Sibelius/Finale question (Eek, I opened a can of worms)

2006-05-03 Thread Robert Patterson
Owain Sutton wrote: (a) building expressions for such things counts as a workaround to me (and if we're picky, 2/8 and 2/10 have different spacing requirements, and I think that's a global setting ;) ). (b) If it's not necessary to implement, how about playback?! When they're part of independ

RE: [Finale] RE: [Olist] Sibelius/Finale question (Eek, I opened a can of worms)

2006-05-03 Thread Owain Sutton
A number of responses, in no order at all > > Duration-linked geometric shapes. > > Custom Lines cover a large number of scenarios, quite likely > including an indicator for improvised sections. > Not with anything like the flexibility I'd have liked. I'll immediately admit that this