From: David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Er, is there a version of Score that is newer than 15 years old?
At 15:56 +0200 10/10/06, Thomas Weber wrote:
According to what I find on my installation disk, the latest version
(4) was released 1999. A number of Score users still sticks to
version
On 12 Oct 2006 at 13:26, shirling neueweise wrote:
From: David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Er, is there a version of Score that is newer than 15 years old?
At 15:56 +0200 10/10/06, Thomas Weber wrote:
According to what I find on my installation disk, the latest version
(4) was released
It sounds like you might find Lilypond attractive. While it is still
something of a work in progress, it does a remarkable job replicating
classical engraving style (for classical repertoire) and has a work
sequence opposite that of Score, in that the notes are entered first,
and then builds
On 13 Oct 2006 at 1:16, Daniel Wolf wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
I haven't seen Score output recently. It used to be vastly superior
to Finale (even done by a gifted Finale engraver). But I always
found it extremely difficult to use, and not very helpful for new
engraving, as the page
On Oct 12, 2006, at 4:48 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
I wish Finale had better defaults so that it took less tweaking to
get things to look right (why can't Finale get beaming right? Why do
I have to run Patterson Beams on every file just to get basic beam
angles to come out correct?).
I
From: Robert Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I've noticed is that many articulations no longer appear in the
same place as before. This has nothing to do with font annotation
files, unless MM changed the ones for their fonts. I've upgraded
some of my files as far as 2006d but cannot bring
On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:28, shirling neueweise wrote:
score has 100% backwards compatibility... one user reports being able
to edit 15-yr old files.
Er, is there a version of Score that is newer than 15 years old?
--
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates
