At 7/28/2005 05:43 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>Now, anti-aliasing, no the other hand, is a completely different
>animal. There should be a choice there for non-ClearType anti-
>aliasing, though I don't know what it is (and don't have an XP system
>to check). Anti-aliasing has been supported in Wi
Brian Williams wrote:
Darcy wrote:
Fin2k6 is IMO very significant. It's not just GPO, it's Studio View,
the mixer, the improved Human Playback, etc -- these are all very big
changes -- plus the switch to CoreGraphics on the Mac side. Of course,
if you don't care about playback, then these f
On 28 Jul 2005 at 20:27, Richard Yates wrote:
>
> > [quoting me, unattributed:]
> > > > And ClearType really only has an effect with LCD displays --
> > > > that's what it was designed for. So, you really shouldn't use
> > > > ClearType for anti-aliasing unless you're using an LCD display.
> > >
> [quoting me, unattributed:]
> > > And ClearType really only has an effect with LCD displays -- that's
> > > what it was designed for. So, you really shouldn't use ClearType for
> > > anti-aliasing unless you're using an LCD display.
> >
> > Not so. I had not heard of ClearType in XP Display opti
On 28 Jul 2005 at 18:24, Richard Yates wrote:
[quoting me, unattributed:]
> > And ClearType really only has an effect with LCD displays -- that's
> > what it was designed for. So, you really shouldn't use ClearType for
> > anti-aliasing unless you're using an LCD display.
>
> Not so. I had not he
> And ClearType really only has an effect with LCD displays -- that's
> what it was designed for. So, you really shouldn't use ClearType for
> anti-aliasing unless you're using an LCD display.
Not so. I had not heard of ClearType in XP Display options until today.
Tried in on my CRT at work. It im
Darcy wrote:
> Fin2k6 is IMO very significant. It's not just GPO, it's Studio View,
> the mixer, the improved Human Playback, etc -- these are all very big
> changes -- plus the switch to CoreGraphics on the Mac side. Of course,
> if you don't care about playback, then these features may not be
On 28 Jul 2005 at 10:34, Kevin Kastning wrote:
> One tip for better font rendering in XP is as follows.
> Right-click the desktop, and select Properties. (Or
> go to Control Panel / Display.) On the Appearance
> tab, click the Effects button. In the Effects window,
> select, "Use the following
One tip for better font rendering in XP is as follows.
Right-click the desktop, and select Properties. (Or
go to Control Panel / Display.) On the Appearance
tab, click the Effects button. In the Effects window,
select, "Use the following method to smooth edges of
screen fonts" (checkmark in sel
