At 20:18 + 2/18/12, Steve Parker wrote:
>I'm anal about snipping on mac.. But from phone by the time I've
>removed the whole message three times, twice copied it to four times
>its original length and forgotten what I was writing in the first
>place I give up..
but if the people who po
>And it's much easier for you to change your behavior than it is to
>expect everyone else to change theirs.
true enough, but i also support this request, and it is also fairly
common "netiquette" to remove unneeded text from one's replies. for
some this is also an accessibility issue: people
I'm anal about snipping on mac.. But from phone by the time I've removed
the whole message three times, twice copied it to four times its original
length and forgotten what I was writing in the first place I give up..
Steve P.
On 18 Feb 2012, at 20:04, Darcy James Argue wrote:
> Geoff,
>
It's likely he won't see that message until the next digest
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Darcy James Argue
wrote:
> Geoff,
>
> Have you considered that this would not be an issue if you did not
> subscribe to the digest, and instead used rules to direct individual
> Finale-list posts to
Geoff,
Have you considered that this would not be an issue if you did not subscribe to
the digest, and instead used rules to direct individual Finale-list posts to a
folder? This makes it much easier to focus on the content that is relevant to
you. And it's much easier for you to change your be
Hi Folks,
When you are responding to discussions, please remember to delete
un-necessary previous responses. Scrolling through and trying to keep
track of 10 or 11 sets of ">"s is not a nice experience, and it becomes
un-necessarily difficult to find the gems within people's comments.
Wednesday's d
