Re: [Finale] Reverse Piano Reduction (sort of)

2006-01-04 Thread Don Hart
Is it too much to ask of MM to request a *comprehensive* listing of all changes in Finale in any given upgrade? When I presented that question to tech support a while back they told me that there were too many little things and the list would be too big, or something like that. The little things

Re: [Finale] Reverse Piano Reduction (sort of)

2006-01-04 Thread David W. Fenton
On 4 Jan 2006 at 13:34, Andrew Stiller wrote: > On Jan 4, 2006, at 7:29 AM, dhbailey wrote: > > > Jim Mays wrote: > > > >>> In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes." > >>> Then transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new > >>> pitches. > >> How counterintuitive

RE: [Finale] Reverse Piano Reduction (sort of)

2006-01-04 Thread David W. Fenton
On 3 Jan 2006 at 22:39, Jim Mays wrote: > > In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes." > > Then transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new > > pitches. > > How counterintuitive is that? It never would have occurred to me to > notice that. > > RTFM I *did* read

Re: [Finale] Reverse Piano Reduction (sort of)

2006-01-04 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jan 4, 2006, at 7:29 AM, dhbailey wrote: Jim Mays wrote: RTFM In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes." Then transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches. How counterintuitive is that? It never would have occurred to me to notice that. While I'

Re: [Finale] Reverse Piano Reduction (sort of)

2006-01-04 Thread dhbailey
Jim Mays wrote: RTFM In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes." Then transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches. How counterintuitive is that? It never would have occurred to me to notice that. While I'm not quite sure that having it in plain

RE: [Finale] Reverse Piano Reduction (sort of)

2006-01-03 Thread Jim Mays
RTFM > In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes." Then > transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches. How counterintuitive is that? It never would have occurred to me to notice that. ___ Finale mailing list

Re: [Finale] Reverse Piano Reduction (sort of)

2006-01-03 Thread David W. Fenton
On 3 Jan 2006 at 18:20, Carolyn Bremer wrote: > In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes." Then > transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches. How counterintuitive is that? It never would have occurred to me to notice that. -- David W. Fenton

Re: [Finale] Reverse Piano Reduction (sort of)

2006-01-03 Thread David W. Fenton
On 3 Jan 2006 at 18:22, Brad Beyenhof wrote: > On 1/3/06, David W. Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is there some simple way to do this with some of the tools Finale > > provides? I ended up putting the octaves by hand, which was pretty > > tedious. > > Yes... just use the Transpose funct

Re: [Finale] Reverse Piano Reduction (sort of)

2006-01-03 Thread Éric Dussault
Couldn't you use the (octave) transpose function in mass edit, and check the "preserve original notes" checkbox?Le 06-01-03 à 21:13, David W. Fenton a écrit : Yes, I could copy to another staff,  transpose, then copy back to the original staff in a different layer,  but what I really wanted was to

Re: [Finale] Reverse Piano Reduction (sort of)

2006-01-03 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On 1/3/06, David W. Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there some simple way to do this with some of the tools Finale > provides? I ended up putting the octaves by hand, which was pretty > tedious. Yes... just use the Transpose function from Mass Edit, and check "Preserve Original Notes." Thi

Re: [Finale] Reverse Piano Reduction (sort of)

2006-01-03 Thread Carolyn Bremer
In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes." Then transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches. -Carolyn On 1/3/06, David W. Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been plugging away at a project over the holidays to arrange a > piece for 4 string parts

[Finale] Reverse Piano Reduction (sort of)

2006-01-03 Thread David W. Fenton
I have been plugging away at a project over the holidays to arrange a piece for 4 string parts as an organ piece. It's worked out quite well. In the process of trying to prepare a MIDI file to produce an MP3 demo, because it's for organ, one of the things I really needed to do was double lines