Is it too much to ask of MM to request a *comprehensive* listing of all
changes in Finale in any given upgrade? When I presented that question to
tech support a while back they told me that there were too many little
things and the list would be too big, or something like that. The little
things
On 4 Jan 2006 at 13:34, Andrew Stiller wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2006, at 7:29 AM, dhbailey wrote:
>
> > Jim Mays wrote:
> >
> >>> In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes."
> >>> Then transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new
> >>> pitches.
> >> How counterintuitive
On 3 Jan 2006 at 22:39, Jim Mays wrote:
> > In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes."
> > Then transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new
> > pitches.
>
> How counterintuitive is that? It never would have occurred to me to
> notice that.
>
> RTFM
I *did* read
On Jan 4, 2006, at 7:29 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Jim Mays wrote:
RTFM
In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes." Then
transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches.
How counterintuitive is that? It never would have occurred to me to
notice that.
While I'
Jim Mays wrote:
RTFM
In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes." Then
transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches.
How counterintuitive is that? It never would have occurred to me to
notice that.
While I'm not quite sure that having it in plain
RTFM
> In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes." Then
> transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches.
How counterintuitive is that? It never would have occurred to me to
notice that.
___
Finale mailing list
On 3 Jan 2006 at 18:20, Carolyn Bremer wrote:
> In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes." Then
> transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches.
How counterintuitive is that? It never would have occurred to me to
notice that.
--
David W. Fenton
On 3 Jan 2006 at 18:22, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
> On 1/3/06, David W. Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there some simple way to do this with some of the tools Finale
> > provides? I ended up putting the octaves by hand, which was pretty
> > tedious.
>
> Yes... just use the Transpose funct
Couldn't you use the (octave) transpose function in mass edit, and check the "preserve original notes" checkbox?Le 06-01-03 à 21:13, David W. Fenton a écrit : Yes, I could copy to another staff, transpose, then copy back to the original staff in a different layer, but what I really wanted was to
On 1/3/06, David W. Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some simple way to do this with some of the tools Finale
> provides? I ended up putting the octaves by hand, which was pretty
> tedious.
Yes... just use the Transpose function from Mass Edit, and check
"Preserve Original Notes." Thi
In the transpose dialogue box check "preserve original notes." Then
transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches.
-Carolyn
On 1/3/06, David W. Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been plugging away at a project over the holidays to arrange a
> piece for 4 string parts
I have been plugging away at a project over the holidays to arrange a
piece for 4 string parts as an organ piece. It's worked out quite
well.
In the process of trying to prepare a MIDI file to produce an MP3
demo, because it's for organ, one of the things I really needed to do
was double lines
12 matches
Mail list logo