Re: [Finale] "Staff Assignment Lists"

2008-10-30 Thread Randolph Peters
Michael Cook wrote: You can't use metatools with the old staff lists, so there's no loss here. This is just a bit of Finale trivia, but there were a few early versions that allowed you to have different metatools for note based expressions and measure based ones. It was useful at the time

Re: [Finale] "Staff Assignment Lists"

2008-10-30 Thread Robert Patterson
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Michael Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I usually use only one score list, but I don't find it "cumbersome" that > there are 7 more in the menu. How often do you actually see the whole list > of lists? Is this not beside the point? Maybe the specific number 8 i

Re: [Finale] "Staff Assignment Lists"

2008-10-30 Thread Michael Cook
On 30 Oct 2008, at 04:18, Robert Patterson wrote: The most interesting enhancement in the new Fin09a release was "staff assignment lists," especially as I had made a lot of noise about Staff Lists after Fin09 came out. MM has upped the number of true "staff lists" (now renamed Score Lists

[Finale] "Staff Assignment Lists"

2008-10-29 Thread Robert Patterson
The most interesting enhancement in the new Fin09a release was "staff assignment lists," especially as I had made a lot of noise about Staff Lists after Fin09 came out. MM has upped the number of true "staff lists" (now renamed Score Lists) to 8. I think this may just wave the red flag again,