Re: [Finale] The last system and measure width lock

2005-07-14 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jul 13, 2005, at 4:27 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote: David W. Fenton schrieb: 2. cautionary accidentals I thought they were locked in versions since about Fin2k. You can tell by a "*" appearing in the Speedy frame when the cursor is on that note (and pitch). This is pretty stable. In ear

Re: [Finale] The last system and measure width lock

2005-07-13 Thread David W. Fenton
On 13 Jul 2005 at 23:12, Johannes Gebauer wrote: > David W. Fenton schrieb: > >>>2. cautionary accidentals > >> > >>I thought they were locked in versions since about Fin2k. You can > >>tell by a "*" appearing in the Speedy frame when the cursor is on > >>that note (and pitch). This is pretty stab

Re: [Finale] The last system and measure width lock

2005-07-13 Thread Johannes Gebauer
David W. Fenton schrieb: 2. cautionary accidentals I thought they were locked in versions since about Fin2k. You can tell by a "*" appearing in the Speedy frame when the cursor is on that note (and pitch). This is pretty stable. In earlier versions you had to manually invoke this condition by

Re: [Finale] The last system and measure width lock

2005-07-13 Thread David W. Fenton
On 13 Jul 2005 at 22:27, Johannes Gebauer wrote: > David W. Fenton schrieb: > > > > 2. cautionary accidentals > > I thought they were locked in versions since about Fin2k. You can tell > by a "*" appearing in the Speedy frame when the cursor is on that note > (and pitch). This is pretty stable.

Re: [Finale] The last system and measure width lock

2005-07-13 Thread Johannes Gebauer
David W. Fenton schrieb: 2. cautionary accidentals I thought they were locked in versions since about Fin2k. You can tell by a "*" appearing in the Speedy frame when the cursor is on that note (and pitch). This is pretty stable. In earlier versions you had to manually invoke this conditio

Re: [Finale] The last system and measure width lock

2005-07-13 Thread David W. Fenton
On 13 Jul 2005 at 12:22, A-NO-NE Music wrote: > Another one. I have been asking the ability to lock measure width > which won't be interfered by further note spacing. Last time I asked > this, I was told not to use auto respace, but that was not my point. > Is this mean no one wants this featur

Re: [Finale] The last system and measure width lock

2005-07-13 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Johannes Gebauer / 2005/07/13 / 03:16 PM wrote: >The reason for me is that any publication I have seen would not do it >this way. Instead the spacing throughout the piece will have to be >tweaked, so that the last system holds a proportional amount of music - >and not just a single measure. I

Re: [Finale] The last system and measure width lock

2005-07-13 Thread Johannes Gebauer
A-NO-NE Music schrieb: Ever since Finale v1.0, my biggest gripe is the last system. Why Finale doesn't intellectually resize last system according to given measure(s) size, or there is such option that I can't find? No, as far as I know there is no such feature. I myself would never use it,

[Finale] The last system and measure width lock

2005-07-13 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Phew, man, reading that many posts in English is almost torturing to me. I hope I didn't miss anything so my following question won't look stoopid. And no, I don't have time to download Sib demo since reading Finale list takes all day long on my end :-) Ever since Finale v1.0, my biggest gripe