Message -
From: "David W. Fenton" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Sibelius version 4 has
dynamic score/parts linking!
On 5 Jul 2005 at 18:25, Tyler Turner wrote:
[] 2. It was mentioned that Finale's playback has
now
At 09:43 PM 7/5/05 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
Fewer and fewer people are actually creating music to be performed by
live musicians. Good computer-based playback means you don't need
human beings.
While Dennis may think this is A Good Thing, I think it's very
distressing -- perhaps the
--- David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That this may very well be true suggests to me one
distressing fact:
Fewer and fewer people are actually creating music
to be performed by
live musicians. Good computer-based playback means
you don't need
human beings.
Yes, problems can
On 5 Jul 2005 at 23:29, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 09:43 PM 7/5/05 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
Fewer and fewer people are actually creating music to be performed by
live musicians. Good computer-based playback means you don't need
human beings. While Dennis may think this is A Good
--- Owain Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What market IS MakeMusic focussing on? A lot of the
uncertainty here is
that we don't know whether there's a real commitment
to engravers, or to
serious composers, because most of the 'advances' or
of no relevance to
these groups.
Engravers, while
a much smaller group, are critical for the success of
Finale because they are key in setting Finale's
reputation.
I have no reason to think that this list is not reasonably representative of
the engravers who you say are key in setting Finale's reputation. Well,
whatever you
--- Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tyler,
We did.
A while back, many of the people on this list came
up with a
reasonably detailed plan for implementing a feature
that looks very
much like Sibelius's Dynamic Parts. Between us, we
decided exactly how
it ought to
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
