Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as, sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-09 Thread Ken Moore
David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7 Oct 2006 at 13:40, Richard Smith wrote: Some really good music by some respected composers is being written for wind ensemble and many composition students are being advised that the best way to hear one's music performed is to write for band,

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as, sequencer/sampler?

2006-10-09 Thread Ken Moore
John Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I just looked it up in A Practical Guide to Percussion Terminology by Russ Girsberger, and it's just as complicated as I thought it would be. Glöckchen: tubular bells; chimes Glocke: bell Glocken: chimes Glockenartig: like a bell; bell-like

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as, sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-09 Thread John Howell
At 12:13 PM +0100 10/9/06, Ken Moore wrote: If you just want to write music and hear it played, without worrying about making a living from it, you get to know lots of good amateurs, and this category is rather better stocked with wind and brass than with strings, in my experience. Ken

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as, sequencer/sampler?

2006-10-09 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Oct 9, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Ken Moore wrote: Also a keyed glockenspiel is jeu de timbres as required for Turangalila. Actually, no. Jeu de timbres means literally set of chimes and is the standard French term for the regular glockenspiel. Messiaen designates the keyboard glockenspiel as

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as, sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-09 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Oct 9, 2006, at 1:38 PM, John Howell wrote: Ken makes a rather nice point in that sentence, and one that truly shows how fuzzy the absolutist definitions can become. In particular, the use of strings in ensembles which are clearly bands, are called bands, and play literature intended

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Daniel Wolf
Chuck Israels wrote: Interesting that celeste is not listed, yet that's what I always hear in Magic Flute performances and recordings. Seems OK to my ears. Chuck No, it's not a celeste, which has softer bars, a damper, and a prominent resonator-generated _Nachklang_. The keyboard

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Daniel Wolf
This table is problematic in that it doesn't distinguish between an instrument with the bars laid-out like a keyboard and an instrument actually played via a keyboard. The modern orchestral bells/glockenspiel/(and their band world near-equivalent, the bell lyra) is laid-out like a keyboard

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread dhbailey
David W. Fenton wrote: On 7 Oct 2006 at 13:40, Richard Smith wrote: Some really good music by some respected composers is being written for wind ensemble and many composition students are being advised that the best way to hear one's music performed is to write for band, not orchestra. Are

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread dhbailey
David W. Fenton wrote: On 7 Oct 2006 at 15:48, Richard Smith wrote: [quoting me, unattributed, again:] But for samples, wouldn't you want a completely different sound? WHile they can play the same repertory, they amount of section doubling is drastically different between the two ensembles. Or

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Bernard Savoie
The saxophone may not be a regular member of the orchestra, but in 20th-century (and beyond) repertoire, it is a frequent guest, more so then certain other instruments such as alto clarinet, or bass flute for instance. I know of well over 2000 pieces of orchestral music which uses saxophone(s) as

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Andrew Stiller
For the difference betw. keyboard glockenspiel and celesta, see my book. Both instruments are required in Messiaen's _Turangalila Symphonie_. Andrew Stiller Kallisti Music Press http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/ ___ Finale mailing list

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread John Howell
At 10:36 AM +0200 10/8/06, Daniel Wolf wrote: Chuck Israels wrote: Interesting that celeste is not listed, yet that's what I always hear in Magic Flute performances and recordings. Seems OK to my ears. Chuck No, it's not a celeste, which has softer bars, a damper, and a prominent

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread John Howell
You may be correct, but I certainly read the definitions as meaning glockenspiel with a keyboard. I think the modern tendency to refer to mallet instruments as keyboards simply clouds the issue, whether it is organologically correct or not. John At 10:43 AM +0200 10/8/06, Daniel Wolf

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Daniel Wolf
John Howell wrote: So which is considered preferable for Tchaikovsky, or do both versions of the instrument actually still exist? JOHN Tchaikovsky requires a celeste. DJW ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread John Howell
At 7:46 AM -0400 10/8/06, dhbailey wrote: One sequencer capability which would be nice in Finale for just such occasions would be the ability to have one staff, one sound, duplicated to different tracks with each one time-shifted a few milliseconds and the multiple tracks detuned randomly

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Mariposa Symphony Orchestra
Re: Celeste or Glock (the latter of ANY type) Tchaikovsky - in the two works of his oeuvre which call for such an instrument (Nutcracker and Voyevoda- the op. 78 ballad and not the op. 3 overture) calls specifically for a celeste, not glock, keyboard or lyre. Celeste has a much softer and

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread David W. Fenton
On 7 Oct 2006 at 18:38, Darcy James Argue wrote: On 07 Oct 2006, at 6:32 PM, Richard Smith wrote: You're right, of course. Doubling the same instrument is just a waste of resources. Egg on my face! Not at all. As I mentioned, in Garritan instruments, doubling the player variations

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 08 Oct 2006, at 7:46 AM, dhbailey wrote: One sequencer capability which would be nice in Finale for just such occasions would be the ability to have one staff, one sound, duplicated to different tracks with each one time-shifted a few milliseconds and the multiple tracks detuned

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 07 Oct 2006, at 8:35 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: Not at all. As I mentioned, in Garritan instruments, doubling the player variations (i.e. Flute Player 1 and Flute Player 2) gives authentic unisons and is not a waste of resources at all. David doesn't use Garritan instruments so the comments

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread David W. Fenton
On 8 Oct 2006 at 16:16, Darcy James Argue wrote: On 08 Oct 2006, at 7:46 AM, dhbailey wrote: One sequencer capability which would be nice in Finale for just such occasions would be the ability to have one staff, one sound, duplicated to different tracks with each one time-shifted a few

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 08 Oct 2006, at 5:09 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: Again, this is something that is very easily done with the VAR1 and VAR2 commands in the Kontakt Player. Could you explicate that a bit, please? VAR1 and VAR2 are controllers in the Kontakt Player that allow you to control the amount of

RE: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Richard Smith
] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?] On 08 Oct 2006, at 5:09 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: Again, this is something that is very easily done with the VAR1 and VAR2 commands in the Kontakt Player. Could you explicate that a bit, please? VAR1 and VAR2 are controllers in the Kontakt

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Darcy James Argue
Richard, Just to clarify the terminology: there is no such thing as the full Kontakt player. There's Kontakt Player and then there's Kontakt. Kontakt Player is included in Finale (as well as the Garritan Instrument Libraries), and supports VAR1, VAR2 etc. Kontakt is a full-blown sampler,

RE: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Richard Smith
08, 2006 5:35 PM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?] Richard, Just to clarify the terminology: there is no such thing as the full Kontakt player. There's Kontakt Player and then there's Kontakt. Kontakt Player is included in Finale

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread David W. Fenton
On 8 Oct 2006 at 17:18, Darcy James Argue wrote: On 08 Oct 2006, at 5:09 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: Again, this is something that is very easily done with the VAR1 and VAR2 commands in the Kontakt Player. Could you explicate that a bit, please? VAR1 and VAR2 are controllers in the

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-08 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 08 Oct 2006, at 7:20 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: OK. I don't understand what all that means. Is Finale producing the output here? Finale is triggering the Kontakt Player, which loads as an audio plugin inside Finale. The Kontakt Player in turn hosts the Garritan instruments and offers

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread dhbailey
Eric Dannewitz wrote: Yes, and I'm sure every orchestra maintains lists for first call Accordian players, and other instruments NOT regularly in the Orchestra. You reinforced my point. Saxophone is not a regular part of an Orchestra. Wind Ensemble/Orchestra, yes, but a traditional Orchestra,

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread dhbailey
Chuck Israels wrote: On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:11 PM, dhbailey wrote: Steve Schow wrote: Regardless of when or how the sax has been used in orchestras, i believe your are mischaracterizing Gary Garritan as he were someone that deliberately left out a particular instrument to try to get more money

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread dhbailey
Eric Dannewitz wrote: Then go edit Wikipedia. However, I doubt they will take your edit. You just said standard additional instrument. It's not a standard instrument, but an additional instrument. Get it? Ok, really slow now.Standard...ADDITIONALinstrument. And say just as

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 07 Oct 2006, at 4:27 AM, dhbailey wrote: Do you mean to tell me that every instrument included in GPO is a regular member of a standard orchestra? I don't think so. I'm not sure how that's relevant. You're saying you want GPO to include fewer instruments? Most orchestras do no have a

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Eric Dannewitz
A Glockenspiel was used in Mozart's Die Zauberflote. But I'm sure Mozart was looking forward and knew it would be just a BAND instrument. Last time I saw the San Francisco Symphony they had a Harp but no saxophones. Funny...according to you they use them..not! One of the ladies I play

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Darcy James Argue
Garritan Wind Ensemble is an upcoming project. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://secretsociety.typepad.com Brooklyn, NY On 07 Oct 2006, at 11:01 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote: Saxophone is a band instrument. Or a Wind ensemble instrument. It's not a part of a traditional Orchestra, and I

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Christopher Smith
On Oct 7, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote: Garritan Wind Ensemble is an upcoming project. Wow! Really? I suppose you have an inside line on this? Christopher (It shouldn't be TOO good, or it will lose the realism. Squeaky clarinets, honky oboes (or else an out of tune muted

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 07 Oct 2006, at 11:24 AM, Christopher Smith wrote: On Oct 7, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote: Garritan Wind Ensemble is an upcoming project. Wow! Really? I suppose you have an inside line on this? If by inside line you mean http://www.garritan.com: Announcing: Garritan

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Very cool. I'll have to start saving up for this ;-) Darcy James Argue wrote: Garritan Wind Ensemble is an upcoming project. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://secretsociety.typepad.com Brooklyn, NY On 07 Oct 2006, at 11:01 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote: Saxophone is a band instrument. Or a

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread John T Sylvanis
So is choirs, solo voices and mandolins, at least it's what Gary told me. John. On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 11:10:54 -0400 Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Garritan Wind Ensemble is an upcoming project. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://secretsociety.typepad.com Brooklyn, NY

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
Alright! Since most of my instrumental writing is for Wind Ensemble, this would be great... yeah, I wonder what it will cost. Dean On Oct 7, 2006, at 9:27 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote: Very cool. I'll have to start saving up for this ;-) Darcy James Argue wrote: Garritan Wind Ensemble is an

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Richard Smith
We've all heard that band but then we have heard an orchestra sound like that too. I challenge you to find that sound from the Dallas Wind Symphony, the Tokyo Kosei Wind Orchestra, or any of the really fine university ensembles. Some really good music by some respected composers is being

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Christopher Smith
On Oct 7, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Richard Smith wrote: We've all heard that band but then we have heard an orchestra sound like that too. I challenge you to find that sound from the Dallas Wind Symphony, the Tokyo Kosei Wind Orchestra, or any of the really fine university ensembles. Some

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread John Howell
At 7:53 PM -0700 10/6/06, Eric Dannewitz wrote: Then go edit Wikipedia. However, I doubt they will take your edit. You just said standard additional instrument. It's not a standard instrument, but an additional instrument. Get it? Ok, really slow

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread David W. Fenton
On 7 Oct 2006 at 4:27, dhbailey wrote: The saxes may be missing because they weren't ready in time, they may be missing because Gary simply felt like it wasn't important to include them (why include glockenspiel, though? That's a band instrument if ever I've seen one) Well, perhaps

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread David W. Fenton
On 7 Oct 2006 at 13:40, Richard Smith wrote: Some really good music by some respected composers is being written for wind ensemble and many composition students are being advised that the best way to hear one's music performed is to write for band, not orchestra. Are we talking about bands

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Richard Smith
The distinctions are not always clear. The wind ensemble's connection to the band should not be obscured but the the connection to older wind music is also important. Richard Smith www.rgsmithmusic.com Are we talking about bands or wind ensemble? Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought there

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread David W. Fenton
On 7 Oct 2006 at 15:20, Richard Smith wrote: [quoting me:] Are we talking about bands or wind ensemble? Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought there was a difference. The distinctions are not always clear. The wind ensemble's connection to the band should not be obscured but the the

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Richard Smith
That's a good point. I suppose I think to much in live terms. Of course doubling could be accomplished by hidden, duplicate staves. I think all I would want that's not in GPO is a good set of concert (not pop) saxophones, cornets and/or flugel horns, and euphonia that sound like euphonia

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread David W. Fenton
On 7 Oct 2006 at 15:48, Richard Smith wrote: [quoting me, unattributed, again:] But for samples, wouldn't you want a completely different sound? WHile they can play the same repertory, they amount of section doubling is drastically different between the two ensembles. Or so I've always

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Daniel Wolf
Eric Dannewitz wrote: A Glockenspiel was used in Mozart's Die Zauberflote. At risk of being picayune, the Glockenspiel used in Zauberflöte is a keyboard instrument somewhat different in sound from the modern, played-with-mallets, orchestral and band glockenspiel. DJW

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Richard Smith
You're right, of course. Doubling the same instrument is just a waste of resources. Egg on my face! I think, for my purposes, I would prefer a wind ensemble to a larger concert band set up because of the greater clarity (much like the real world). Richard Smith www.rgsmithmusic.com

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 07 Oct 2006, at 6:32 PM, Richard Smith wrote: You're right, of course. Doubling the same instrument is just a waste of resources. Egg on my face! Not at all. As I mentioned, in Garritan instruments, doubling the player variations (i.e. Flute Player 1 and Flute Player 2) gives

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Richard Smith
I seem to be having trouble with language. When I said instruments, I meant samples, not different samples of the same instrument. Sorry for being unclear. Richard Smith www.rgsmithmusic.com Not at all. As I mentioned, in Garritan instruments, doubling the player variations (i.e. Flute

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread John T Sylvanis
True, Richard Strauss used it in Don Juan. John. On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 00:17:19 +0200 Daniel Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eric Dannewitz wrote: A Glockenspiel was used in Mozart's Die Zauberflote. At risk of being picayune, the Glockenspiel used in Zauberflöte is a keyboard instrument

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
Was it a celesta? Dean At risk of being picayune, the Glockenspiel used in Zauberflöte is a keyboard instrument somewhat different in sound from the modern, played-with-mallets, orchestral and band glockenspiel. DJW Dean M. Estabrook [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have you ever heard of an eleven or

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread John Howell
At 4:04 PM -0400 10/7/06, David W. Fenton wrote: On 7 Oct 2006 at 13:40, Richard Smith wrote: Some really good music by some respected composers is being written for wind ensemble and many composition students are being advised that the best way to hear one's music performed is to write for

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread John Howell
I think it was--or at least the late 18th century equivalent. I also suspect that the German Glockenspiel can actually refer to different instruments in translation. It's possible that celesta is one of them, as well as the mallet-played orchestra bells. What I grew up calling a

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Chuck Israels
Interesting that celeste is not listed, yet that's what I always hear in Magic Flute performances and recordings. Seems OK to my ears. Chuck On Oct 7, 2006, at 4:42 PM, John Howell wrote: I think it was--or at least the late 18th century equivalent. I also suspect that the German

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
This dialog serves to remind me of an experience I had in my first year of teaching ... ca. 1966. Our high school had a very fine advanced band called a Wind Ensemble, which, in fact, had a minimum number of players per part, in general. Then there was a less advanced Concert Band, with

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread John Howell
On the contrary, three of the terms mean a keyboard instrument as the single or one possible meaning. John At 5:58 PM -0700 10/7/06, Chuck Israels wrote: Interesting that celeste is not listed, yet that's what I always hear in Magic Flute performances and recordings. Seems OK to my ears.

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread Eric Dannewitz
I don't believe saxophone is included in an orchestra. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestra I don't believe that the London Symphony Orchestra has saxophones in it. Ken Moore wrote: dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Garritan also made money by not including some very important instruments

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread Martin Banner
It is, if you're playing Ravel, among other composers... On Oct 6, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote: I don't believe saxophone is included in an orchestra. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestra I don't believe that the London Symphony Orchestra has saxophones in it. Martin Banner

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread Steve Schow
Regardless of when or how the sax has been used in orchestras, i believe your are mischaracterizing Gary Garritan as he were someone that deliberately left out a particular instrument to try to get more money from you later. Many people know that Gary Garritan is one of the nicest people in the

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread Chuck Israels
Just a quick response to the complaint about instrumentation in sample libraries. Whoever makes them and markets them has to decide what to include and what to leave out, just as MM must make similar decisions about their products. It seems foolish to criticize the exclusion of one or two

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread Christopher Smith
On Oct 6, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote: I don't believe saxophone is included in an orchestra. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestra I don't believe that the London Symphony Orchestra has saxophones in it. Hey, the LSO doesn't even list a bass trombonist, so I don't know how

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread Chuck Israels
On Oct 6, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Steve Schow wrote: Regardless of when or how the sax has been used in orchestras, i believe your are mischaracterizing Gary Garritan as he were someone that deliberately left out a particular instrument to try to get more money from you later. Many people know

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread dhbailey
Except when they're programming works which call for saxophone, and then you can be there's saxophones in the London Symphony Orchestra. Every orchestra maintains lists of first-call players for instruments which they choose not to maintain a regular seat for. David H. Bailey Eric

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread dhbailey
Steve Schow wrote: Regardless of when or how the sax has been used in orchestras, i believe your are mischaracterizing Gary Garritan as he were someone that deliberately left out a particular instrument to try to get more money from you later. Many people know that Gary Garritan is one of the

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Yes, and I'm sure every orchestra maintains lists for first call Accordian players, and other instruments NOT regularly in the Orchestra. You reinforced my point. Saxophone is not a regular part of an Orchestra. Wind Ensemble/Orchestra, yes, but a traditional Orchestra, no. dhbailey wrote:

RE: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread Williams, Jim
Steve Schow wrote: Regardless of when or how the sax has been used in orchestras, i believe your are mischaracterizing Gary Garritan as he were someone that deliberately left out a particular instrument to try to get more money from you later. Many people know that Gary Garritan is one

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Oct 6, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote: I don't believe saxophone is included in an orchestra. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestra I don't believe that the London Symphony Orchestra has saxophones in it. It does when it needs to. The Wikipedia article clearly needs tweaking

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread Chuck Israels
On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:11 PM, dhbailey wrote: Steve Schow wrote: Regardless of when or how the sax has been used in orchestras, i believe your are mischaracterizing Gary Garritan as he were someone that deliberately left out a particular instrument to try to get more money from you later.

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread John Howell
At 12:11 PM -0700 10/6/06, Eric Dannewitz wrote: I don't believe saxophone is included in an orchestra. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestra You missed the asterisk! But in this case, Wikipedia fails to be all things to all people, although it certainly tries hard. Saxophone is a

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread David W. Fenton
On 6 Oct 2006 at 22:31, John Howell wrote: At 12:11 PM -0700 10/6/06, Eric Dannewitz wrote: I don't believe saxophone is included in an orchestra. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestra You missed the asterisk! But in this case, Wikipedia fails to be all things to all people, although it

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Then go edit Wikipedia. However, I doubt they will take your edit. You just said standard additional instrument. It's not a standard instrument, but an additional instrument. Get it? Ok, really slow now.Standard...ADDITIONALinstrument. So, yeah, they will ADD a saxophonist or

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-06 Thread Richard Smith
Whether or you consider the sax a part of the orchestra or not, I have yet to hear a sampled sax sound that couldn't totally destroy all of the other instruments. In my concert band scores, usually replace the sax sounds with clarinet so I can preserve some balance. I would love a sampled