Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-03 Thread Andrew Stiller
trio to the scherzo of Beethoven's 9th. Tradition has one bar of cut time equal 2 bars of the preceding 3/4, but B's own metronome mark demands a tempo *twice as fast.* I played it once thus under Rene Leibowitz, and it was a revelation--much more exciting and dramatic than the traditional

RE: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-02 Thread Lee Actor
> > [snip] > >> lone 6/8 bar immediately > >> before rehearsal G in the first mvt. of Hindemith's _Symphonische > >> Metamorphosen_. > > > > > I agree that there is a potential metrical ambiguity in the passage you > > cite, though musically I think it's clear that the eighth note stays > > the >

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-02 Thread Phil Daley
Interesting coincidence. I went to the Boston Pops concert last night. One of the numbers (Burt Bacharat) was in a fast 4.  It had some obvious 6/4 (3/2) measures in it (with 3 half notes as the predominate rhythm). But Keith Lochart conducted right through them in 3/4, as though there were 3 beat

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-02 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jul 1, 2005, at 6:14 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote: there are lots old editions out there with the order reversed (new value = old value). I don't know why *anyone* ever thought that was a good way of indicating tempo shifts, but unfortunately, it's not uncommon. It used to be absolute

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-02 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jul 1, 2005, at 2:54 PM, Lee Actor wrote: [snip] lone 6/8 bar immediately before rehearsal G in the first mvt. of Hindemith's _Symphonische Metamorphosen_. I agree that there is a potential metrical ambiguity in the passage you cite, though musically I think it's clear that the eighth

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-01 Thread Owain Sutton
Darcy James Argue wrote: Hi Owain, I agree, but there are lots old editions out there with the order reversed (new value = old value). I don't know why *anyone* ever thought that was a good way of indicating tempo shifts, but unfortunately, it's not uncommon. Interesting - I'll look ou

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-01 Thread David W. Fenton
On 1 Jul 2005 at 23:02, Owain Sutton wrote: > David W. Fenton wrote: > > > I don't agree that it's problematic to indicate something like E = E > > when there's a change of time signature whose interpretation is > > ambiguous. The hard part is when it's something like Q = H, where it > > may be t

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-01 Thread Darcy James Argue
Hi Owain, I agree, but there are lots old editions out there with the order reversed (new value = old value). I don't know why *anyone* ever thought that was a good way of indicating tempo shifts, but unfortunately, it's not uncommon. Putting the "=" directly above the barline is good pract

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-01 Thread Owain Sutton
David W. Fenton wrote: I don't agree that it's problematic to indicate something like E = E when there's a change of time signature whose interpretation is ambiguous. The hard part is when it's something like Q = H, where it may be that the old quarter equals the new half, or the old half e

RE: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-01 Thread Lee Actor
[snip] > Some > passages are simply insoluble, such as the lone 6/8 bar immediately > before rehearsal G in the first mvt. of Hindemith's _Symphonische > Metamorphosen_. The prevailing meter is 2/4; is the beat to be held > constant through the 6/8 measure (compound meter), or the note values > (s

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-01 Thread David W. Fenton
On 1 Jul 2005 at 12:28, Andrew Stiller wrote: > On Jun 30, 2005, at 9:55 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: > > > I'm puzzled by why one would want to "rationalize" 6/8 to 6/12, > > While I agree that 6/12 is a bad solution, that does not mean there is > no problem. Composers for at least a century have

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-01 Thread David W. Fenton
On 1 Jul 2005 at 11:38, Gerald Berg wrote: > Unfortunately i could not down load the mp3 file David. Probably it wasn't clear that there was a space between "Coperario- Fantasy" and "à3". If you go to http://www.dfenton.com/Collegium/SideBySideViols/ you can then click on the file from there (i

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-01 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jun 30, 2005, at 9:55 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: I'm puzzled by why one would want to "rationalize" 6/8 to 6/12, While I agree that 6/12 is a bad solution, that does not mean there is no problem. Composers for at least a century have found the traditional notation of compound meters to

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-07-01 Thread Gerald Berg
Unfortunately i could not down load the mp3 file David. Awfully naked score! i don't think I could resist mucking it up more if it were mine. The idea is very familiar to me... my music wouldn't exist without it. I do like the idea of using a bracket to delineate internal phrasing -- Cres

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-06-30 Thread David W. Fenton
On 30 Jun 2005 at 10:46, Christopher Smith wrote: > On Jun 30, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Gerald Berg wrote: > > > > Anyone ever read Paul Creston's Rational Metric Notation? > > > > He advocates replaces 6/8 with 6/12. > > I read another book of his on rhythm (I forget the name now) and liked > what he

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-06-30 Thread David W. Fenton
On 30 Jun 2005 at 20:59, Owain Sutton wrote: > David W. Fenton wrote: > > > If you're talking about choosing a meter for a composition of your > > own, you'd make the choice depending on what the musicians you're > > composing for would expect. If I'm writing for viol consort, I'd > > choose 3/2,

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-06-30 Thread Owain Sutton
David W. Fenton wrote: If you're talking about choosing a meter for a composition of your own, you'd make the choice depending on what the musicians you're composing for would expect. If I'm writing for viol consort, I'd choose 3/2, since viols are more accustomed to reading small subdivisi

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-06-30 Thread David W. Fenton
On 30 Jun 2005 at 2:09, Neal Schermerhorn wrote: > NOW - 3/2 could be felt in "one" but who would do such a thing? 3/4 or > 3/8 would more meaningfully carry the sense of "in one" to the > musician. 3/2 is almost always felt in 3. Well, depends on what you're talking about. If you're talking abo

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-06-30 Thread Christopher Smith
On Jun 30, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Gerald Berg wrote: Anyone ever read Paul Creston's Rational Metric Notation? He advocates replaces 6/8 with 6/12. I read another book of his on rhythm (I forget the name now) and liked what he had to say on the subject. There is so little written on the theor

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-06-30 Thread Gerald Berg
Well it does have rational in the title... :) Jerry On 30-Jun-05, at 9:08 AM, Owain Sutton wrote: Gerald Berg wrote: Anyone ever read Paul Creston's Rational Metric Notation? He advocates replaces 6/8 with 6/12. Jerry I haven't read it - but it sounds like this theory would conflict w

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-06-30 Thread Owain Sutton
Gerald Berg wrote: Anyone ever read Paul Creston's Rational Metric Notation? He advocates replaces 6/8 with 6/12. Jerry I haven't read it - but it sounds like this theory would conflict with the more common(!) use of x/10, x/12 etc. in Ferneyhough and the like. __

Re: [Finale] Re: half rests in 6/4?

2005-06-30 Thread Gerald Berg
Well placed Neal. But I know my eyes won't let me follow. I just can't see it in a passage that mixes time sig. So 4/4 5/4 3/4 6/4 3/2 7/4 Often times I find my 5/4 and 7/4 alternating like 3+2/5 then 2+3/5 Throwing a 3/2 into the mix (to me) indicates a sort of half time feel (that is ) th