On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 05:57 PM 1/5/2007, Andrew Stiller wrote:
>O.K Then this brings us (or me anyway) back to square 1: If I
>create a PDF thus and send it to Lulu, will it likely look the same
>printed w. their facilities?
I'm coming in late to this discu
On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 05:57 PM 1/5/2007, Andrew Stiller wrote:
>O.K Then this brings us (or me anyway) back to square 1: If I
>create a PDF thus and send it to Lulu, will it likely look the same
>printed w. their facilities?
I'm coming in late to this discu
At 06:04 PM 1/5/2007 -0500, Aaron Sherber wrote:
>I'm coming in late to this discussion. In general, yes -- a PDF with
>fonts embedded should look the same no matter where it is printed.
Should is the operant word. We've discussed this before, and I've
recommended getting the Postscript printer d
At 05:57 PM 1/5/2007, Andrew Stiller wrote:
>O.K Then this brings us (or me anyway) back to square 1: If I
>create a PDF thus and send it to Lulu, will it likely look the same
>printed w. their facilities?
I'm coming in late to this discussion. In general, yes -- a PDF with
fonts embedded
On Jan 5, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Leigh Daniels wrote:
With FinMac2007a under OS X 10.4.8 I just printed a Finale document to
PDF and looked at it with Acrobat 7.0 Professional. It reported that
partial fonts were embedded. When I printed to PostScript and had
Acrobat create the PDF, it had the same
With FinMac2007a under OS X 10.4.8 I just printed a Finale document to
PDF and looked at it with Acrobat 7.0 Professional. It reported that
partial fonts were embedded. When I printed to PostScript and had
Acrobat create the PDF, it had the same partial fonts embedded.
**Leigh
On Fri, Jan 5, 2007
