Re: [Fink-beginners] Invoking init.sh under Leopard

2008-03-12 Thread David T.
Well, /sw/bin/pathsetup.sh tells me I'm already set up. However, F::Q now works. Thanks! --- Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:53 PM, David T. wrote: > > > Hi. After some time without a functional Finance::Quote (after > > upgrading my > > Intel Mac to L

Re: [Fink-beginners] Invoking init.sh under Leopard

2008-03-12 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:53 PM, David T. wrote: > Hi. After some time without a functional Finance::Quote (after > upgrading my > Intel Mac to Leopard 10.5.2) for Gnucash, I (re)figured out that > F::Q would > work for me again when I triggered /sw/bin/init.sh before calling > gnucash. > > Whe

[Fink-beginners] Invoking init.sh under Leopard

2008-03-12 Thread David T.
Hi. After some time without a functional Finance::Quote (after upgrading my Intel Mac to Leopard 10.5.2) for Gnucash, I (re)figured out that F::Q would work for me again when I triggered /sw/bin/init.sh before calling gnucash. When I first got GC running, I remember following the advice on Fink ab

Re: [Fink-beginners] can't see all the install packages

2008-03-12 Thread Alexander Hansen
Jon Choy wrote: > I've just installed fink on my MAC that has leopard 10.5.2. I used > fink package 0.28 and built it from that. I can see some of the > packages; but not all. I've checked the /sw/etc/fink.conf file and it > has the following listed: > Trees: local/main stable/main stable/cry

[Fink-beginners] can't see all the install packages

2008-03-12 Thread Jon Choy
I've just installed fink on my MAC that has leopard 10.5.2. I used fink package 0.28 and built it from that. I can see some of the packages; but not all. I've checked the /sw/etc/fink.conf file and it has the following listed: Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto unstable/main unstable/cr

Re: [Fink-beginners] compile time for octave > 1 day?

2008-03-12 Thread Javier Arantegui
Hi, On 3/12/08, Mojca Miklavec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Octave keeps compiling for more than 24 hours already and doesn't seem > to stop soon. I suspect that there might be some infinite loop over > make proces As alternative to those long compilation times, you could use the binary version o

Re: [Fink-beginners] autoconf fails to build

2008-03-12 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > >> Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> [] > >> > >>> texi2html -split_chapter ./standards.texi > >> > ** Unknown command with braces [EMAI

Re: [Fink-beginners] autoconf fails to build

2008-03-12 Thread Martin Costabel
Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: >> Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> [] >> >>> texi2html -split_chapter ./standards.texi >> > ** Unknown command with braces [EMAIL PROTECTED]' (in ./make-stds.texi l. >> 679) >> >> I see two bugs conspiring here: The '@tie{

Re: [Fink-beginners] autoconf fails to build (was: compile time for octave > 1 day?)

2008-03-12 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > Mojca Miklavec wrote: > [] > > > texi2html -split_chapter ./standards.texi > > ** Unknown command with braces [EMAIL PROTECTED]' (in ./make-stds.texi l. > 679) > > I see two bugs conspiring here: The '@tie{}' command is indeed > undefin

Re: [Fink-beginners] autoconf fails to build (was: compile time for octave > 1 day?)

2008-03-12 Thread Martin Costabel
Mojca Miklavec wrote: [] > texi2html -split_chapter ./standards.texi > ** Unknown command with braces [EMAIL PROTECTED]' (in ./make-stds.texi l. 679) I see two bugs conspiring here: The '@tie{}' command is indeed undefined; I see that it gets inserted unchanged into the html file /sw/share/doc/au

Re: [Fink-beginners] compile time for octave > 1 day?

2008-03-12 Thread Martin Costabel
Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Hello, > > What are usually compile times for most hungry fink packages? Octave is not the worst. If you count all its dependencies that may be built with it, it can take some time, though. > Octave keeps compiling for more than 24 hours already and doesn't seem Compile