Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency

> > The first one. That's in the historically standard place for 10.6. > > The easiest option for you might be: > > sudo mkdir -p > /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0_65-b14-462.jdk/ Contents/Home/1.6.0/Headers > > sudo ln -s > /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/A/ Hea

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency

On 2/20/14 2:20 PM, Kirill Muradov wrote: >> >> The first one. That's in the historically standard place for 10.6. >> >> The easiest option for you might be: >> >> sudo mkdir -p >> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0_65-b14-462.jdk/ > Contents/Home/1.6.0/Headers >> >> sudo ln -s >> /System/Lib

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency

On 2/20/14 8:51 AM, Kirill Muradov wrote: > Alexander Hansen gmail.com> writes: > >> > >> >> I hate Java on OS X! On my own 10.6 environment, installed less >> than a year ago from a fresh download, the _same_ version of Java is >> installed in a different location. >> >> The problem here appears

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency

Alexander Hansen gmail.com> writes: > > > I hate Java on OS X! On my own 10.6 environment, installed less > than a year ago from a fresh download, the _same_ version of Java is > installed in a different location. > > The problem here appears to be that fink expects that your jni.h to be

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency

On 2/20/14 6:18 AM, Kirill Muradov wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I have read through numerous posts, > yet couldn't find a solution to this > well-known issue in my case. > So decided to write a new post. > > I use Mac OS X 10.6.8. My problem: when > trying to install Octave, got the message: > "Can

[Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency

Hello everyone! I have read through numerous posts, yet couldn't find a solution to this well-known issue in my case. So decided to write a new post. I use Mac OS X 10.6.8. My problem: when trying to install Octave, got the message: "Can't resolve dependency "system-java-dev (>= 1.5-1)" for packa

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "intltool40"

On 10/8/13 2:50 PM, Charles E Spiekermann wrote: > Here's the responses. > > $ fink -V | head -n 2 > Package manager version: 0.35.2 > Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Tue Oct 8 14:23:44 2013, 10.8, > x86_64 > > $ grep Mirror-rsync /sw/etc/fink.conf > Mirror-rsync: rsync://distfiles.master.f

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "intltool40"

charles spiekermann , fink-beginners@lists.sourceforge.net, Date: 2013/10/08 02:40 PM Subject: Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "intltool40" On 10/8/2013 5:03 PM, charles spiekermann wrote: > I'm trying to install meld using Fink 0.35.2 on a Mac

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "intltool40"

On 10/8/2013 5:03 PM, charles spiekermann wrote: > I'm trying to install meld using Fink 0.35.2 on a Mac with 10.8.5. > fink install meld > gives me > Can't resolve dependency "intltool40" for package "meld-1.5.3-1" (no matching > packages/versions found) > Exiting with failure. Please provide the

[Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "intltool40"

I'm trying to install meld using Fink 0.35.2 on a Mac with 10.8.5. fink install meld gives me Can't resolve dependency "intltool40" for package "meld-1.5.3-1" (no matching packages/versions found) Exiting with failure. Any help is appreciated. thanks.

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Sergio De Zordo wrote: > Martin was right. I created the symlink /usr/X11R6 -> X11 and > everything worked fine. Good. I think the X11User.pkg installer should have created the symlink, but we all know how this installer is doing its job... -- Martin

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Martin was right. I created the symlink /usr/X11R6 -> X11 and everything worked fine. Thank you all. Sergio Il giorno 07/mar/08, alle ore 23:08, Martin Costabel ha scritto: > Sergio De Zordo wrote: >> Il giorno 07/mar/08, alle ore 22:09, Martin Costabel ha scritto: >>> Are you saying

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Martin, I really appreciate your support. I will try out your solution as soon as I will get back from work. Thanks Sergio 2008/3/7, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > - checking for library libX11.6.dylib... missing > > This here seems to be the only check performed on the subject of x11

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Great. :-) 2008/3/6, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sergio De Zordo wrote: > > I also read: > > > > > >>checking for library libX11.6.dylib... missing > > > > > > Is this bad? > > Yes. > > -- > Martin > > - This SF.ne

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Martin, since the full log is quite large, I'm sending you privately. Thanks Sergio 2008/3/6, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sergio De Zordo wrote: > > Martin, > > > > just to be as clear as possible, what I actually did was: > > > > - Removed Fink and all packages > > - Upgraded

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Sergio De Zordo wrote: > I also read: > > >>checking for library libX11.6.dylib... missing > > > Is this bad? Yes. -- Martin - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studi

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Sergio De Zordo wrote: > Martin, > > just to be as clear as possible, what I actually did was: > > - Removed Fink and all packages > - Upgraded X11 to 2.1.4 > - Upgraded XCode Tools to 3.0 > - Installed Fink from source I think upgrading Xcode to 3.0 may be cause of the problem, for two r

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

I also read: > checking for library libX11.6.dylib... missing Is this bad? Thanks Sergio Il giorno 05/mar/08, alle ore 22:58, Alexander K. Hansen ha scritto: > That would indeed be a sign of trouble. There should also be some > messages > indicating which files are being looked for

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Martin, just to be as clear as possible, what I actually did was: - Removed Fink and all packages - Upgraded X11 to 2.1.4 - Upgraded XCode Tools to 3.0 - Installed Fink from source Greetings Sergio Il giorno 05/mar/08, alle ore 22:15, Martin Costabel ha scritto: > Alexander K

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Martin, thank you. Actually, I had Fink installed on Tiger 10.4.9 and everything worked fine. Then, I upgraded to 10.5, 10.5.1 and 10.5.2. Since a few issues started to come out after that, and since I had a huge /sw folder, I decided to go for a full removal & clean re- install. Of

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

That would indeed be a sign of trouble. There should also be some messages indicating which files are being looked for to activate the appropriate virtual packages. On Wednesday 05 March 2008 04:16:24 pm Sergio De Zordo wrote: > Here comes the output: > > Package: system-pkgconfig-x11 > > Statu

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Here comes the output: Package: system-pkgconfig-x11 Status: install ok installed Version: 1.1.3-1 homepage: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage description: [virtual pkgconfig package representing x11] This is the only package containing the keywork "x11" Thanks

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > Try "fink-virtual-pkgs --debug". That will produce verbose output as to > what's going on in the x11 virtual package generation. > > Unfortunately, Apple seems to have stopped putting the X11User package online > after 10.3 Just for the record, and because this doe

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Try "fink-virtual-pkgs --debug". That will produce verbose output as to what's going on in the x11 virtual package generation. Unfortunately, Apple seems to have stopped putting the X11User package online after 10.3 On Wednesday 05 March 2008 03:10:42 pm Sergio De Zordo wrote: > Alexande

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Alexander, thank you for your help. I think I had the original Leopard-shipped X11 version correctly installed before I upgraded to X11 2.1.4, but I'm not sure. So, I think I ought to re-install it, try fink, and then possibly upgrade. Unfortunately, I'm away from my place at the mo

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Sergio De Zordo wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm running Leopard 10.5.2. To get Fink installed, I did the following: > > - I installed the latest version of X11 (2.1.4) > - I installed the latest version of XCode Tools (3.0) > > Now, I bootstrapped Fink and everything went fine. Unfortunately, >

[Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11" on Leopard

Hi folks, I'm running Leopard 10.5.2. To get Fink installed, I did the following: - I installed the latest version of X11 (2.1.4) - I installed the latest version of XCode Tools (3.0) Now, I bootstrapped Fink and everything went fine. Unfortunately, whenever I type "fink install SomePa

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11"

On 10/28/07, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Orriss Jr wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm seeing this error trying to install gtk+2. How do I get around it? > > > > Information about 6074 packages read in 0 seconds. > > Can't resolve dependency "x11" for package "gtk+2-2.6.10-1003"

Re: [Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11"

David Orriss Jr wrote: > Hi, > > I'm seeing this error trying to install gtk+2. How do I get around it? > > Information about 6074 packages read in 0 seconds. > Can't resolve dependency "x11" for package "gtk+2-2.6.10-1003" (no matching > packages/versions found) > Exiting with failure. > > > W

[Fink-beginners] Can't resolve dependency "x11"

Hi, I'm seeing this error trying to install gtk+2. How do I get around it? Information about 6074 packages read in 0 seconds. Can't resolve dependency "x11" for package "gtk+2-2.6.10-1003" (no matching packages/versions found) Exiting with failure. -- David Orriss Jr. My blog: http://www.cod