I've been reading the recent posts to the effect that, by placing the
source tarballs in /sw/src, fink install will "do the job."
gimp-1.2.2 has been replaced by gimp-1.2.3. I've downloaded it and
placed the .tar.gz file in /sw/src. I chown and chgrp to root and
admin and checked the permissio
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Stan Sanderson wrote:
> I've been reading the recent posts to the effect that, by placing the
> source tarballs in /sw/src, fink install will "do the job."
>
> gimp-1.2.2 has been replaced by gimp-1.2.3.
Ok, while an update to the Fink libraries is pending, you should be ab
Two small remarks:
Chris Devers wrote:
[]
> ...or something to that effect. You should be able to copy each of these
> files to a properly numbered version, then edit the contents of the new
> files appropriately:
>
> % cd /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/graphics
> % cp gimp-1.2.2-4.
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Two small remarks:
>
> If you do your own editing of fink package descriptions, in order to
> avoid conflicts with later updates, it is generally better to do this in
> the "local" distribution and leave the "stable" and "unstable" dists as
> they are
