Re: [Fink-beginners] package version in fink versus latest version

2002-03-11 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 3/11/02 13:11, "Joel L. Breazeale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In running gaim I notice the fink unstable version is 0.51-1 and the > latest version in http://gaim.sourceforge.net is 0.53. There are some > problems which I beleive are fixed in version 0.53. How does one > go about caus

Re: [Fink-beginners] package version in fink versus latest version

2002-03-11 Thread Chris Devers
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Joel L. Breazeale wrote: > In other words, how does one go about discovering who did the work to > get gaim into fink in the first place and then see if the same folks > would be willing to do an update? Packages are descibed by info files in your /sw/fink/dists tree. The M

Re: [Fink-beginners] package version in fink versus latest version

2002-03-11 Thread Max Horn
At 12:11 Uhr -0600 11.03.2002, Joel L. Breazeale wrote: >Folks, > >I wanted to run gaim and installed it after having to update fink >to 0.3.2a. The upgrade was not a pretty sight, but after I debugged >the selfupdate then figured out I needed to (re)install the 10.1 >Developer's Tools then the g

[Fink-beginners] package version in fink versus latest version

2002-03-11 Thread Joel L. Breazeale
Folks, I wanted to run gaim and installed it after having to update fink to 0.3.2a. The upgrade was not a pretty sight, but after I debugged the selfupdate then figured out I needed to (re)install the 10.1 Developer's Tools then the gaim build went fine. It's so nice to be able to get under the