Hmm, Camino is mangling my outgoing text?
This is probably obvious, but this post should read:
Craig needs a quiz too!
Please choose (1) or (2):
(1) svn has a GUI
(2) svn does not have a GUI
I'll give you a hint: when I run the command 'svn', what happens?
--- Jeff Spitz <[EMAIL PROT
Craig needs a quiz too!
Please choose (1) or (2):
(1) svsvnas a GUI
(2) svsvnoes not have a GUI
I'll give you a hint: when I run the command 'svsvn what happens?
--- Craig Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think you embarrassed yourself. On the fink download page, it
> clearly states t
--- Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/18/06, Jeff Spitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, I just installed fink. The very first package I tried to install
> > was svn, which apparently requires X11. This is so incredibly stupid that
> > it gives me the urge to uninsta
Alexander Hansen wrote:
> And why would you think we'd make people install -anything- that
> wasn't necessary, especially X11? Get real!
>
> If you were to install the version from the binary distribution, you'd
> find a much leaner list of packages. Here's what shows up for my
> already-built
On Oct 18, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Jeff Spitz wrote:
>
> Hello, I just installed fink. The very first package I tried to
> install
> was svn, which apparently requires X11. This is so incredibly
> stupid that
> it gives me the urge to uninstall fink immediately.
>
> Note 'xfree86 xfree86-shlibs'
On 10/18/06, Jeff Spitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello, I just installed fink. The very first package I tried to install
> was svn, which apparently requires X11. This is so incredibly stupid that
> it gives me the urge to uninstall fink immediately.
>
Go for it. We're not stopping you.
Hello, I just installed fink. The very first package I tried to install
was svn, which apparently requires X11. This is so incredibly stupid that
it gives me the urge to uninstall fink immediately.
Note 'xfree86 xfree86-shlibs' at the end of the package list. Idiots.
merlin:~% fink selfupdat
