I'm a longtime (maybe four years, now!) Debian user who bought a Mac
laptop because of Fink, so excuse me if I go about this the wrong way,
but:
Why do we even have this "fink" program?
What about the Debian system didn't work?
If you look at the fink-beginners mailing list, they're literally
The base part of 0.3.2a is complete. I have uploaded
packages-0.3.2a.tar.gz, fink-0.3.2a-full.tar.gz and
fink-0.3.2a-installer.dmg.gz to SourceForge. The download & package
database web pages have already been updated. I also added a 0.3.2a
branch to the bindist.
I will have to start building
Le mardi 15 janvier 2002, à 11:59 PM, Matthew S. Harris a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I've packaged a few of the programs that I've gotten to work under OS
> X, and according to the fink-devel description, this is the place to
> post the package descriptions to get them added to Fink.
You're
Hi all,
I've packaged a few of the programs that I've gotten to work under OS
X, and according to the fink-devel description, this is the place to
post the package descriptions to get them added to Fink. I've been
pretty careful to make sure they are well-behaved, so I don't expect
any problems
At 22:20 Uhr + 15.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 10:17 pm, Max Horn wrote:
>
>>At 22:03 Uhr + 15.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>>
>>>Ummm http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/porting/index.php
>>
>>"full detail porting guide" -> no.
>
>Kinda "developer FAQ"
if it's not I agree
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Kinda "developer FAQ"-ish, though. And is common. I think
>it should be added :-)
¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,
Justin F. Hallett
CAISnet Inc.
2nd Floor, 11635 - 160 Stree
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 10:17 pm, Max Horn wrote:
> At 22:03 Uhr + 15.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>
>> Ummm http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/porting/index.php
>
> "full detail porting guide" -> no.
Kinda "developer FAQ"-ish, though. And is common. I think
it should be added
At 22:03 Uhr + 15.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 06:35 pm, Max Horn wrote:
>
>>Plus there is no "developer FAQ" currently. I am not sure if it is
>>exactly part of our goal to write a full detail porting guide,
>>anyway. At least I don't see where the resour
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 06:35 pm, Max Horn wrote:
> Plus there is no "developer FAQ" currently. I am not sure if it is
> exactly part of our goal to write a full detail porting guide, anyway.
> At least I don't see where the resources for such a thing should come,
> but if anybody i
I will now tag the package CVS for 0.3.2a, and begin testing /
building the release. If you have any concerns or want to have some
changes absolutly in, contact me directly, and do it *now*. In
emergencies, you can reach me in our IRC channel (#fink on
irc.openprojects.net, just say something
On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 05:35, Max Horn wrote:
> This violates POSIX, is easy to fix, the fix has basically no bad
> side effects, it was changed in FreeBSD a long time ago AFAIK, but
> well, on Darwin it's there anyway :)
OK - I have a clue now. :) Must have been dealt with on NetBSD as well,
si
At 15:15 Uhr +1100 15.01.2002, Mike Barnes wrote:
[...]
>Oh, small request: could someone put the "include sys/types.h before
>dirent.h" problem into an FAQ somewhere.
Well it's sort of a standard BSD problem, that's why it's not
mentioned a - unix programmer should know it :). Plus there is no
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 06:30 pm, Max Horn wrote:
> At 18:20 Uhr + 15.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>> On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 10:41 pm, Max Horn wrote:
>>
>>> Also, is it a good idea to use 0.3.2a (originally I thought this was
>>> good to indicate only small things chan
At 18:20 Uhr + 15.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 10:41 pm, Max Horn wrote:
>
>>Also, is it a good idea to use 0.3.2a (originally I thought this
>>was good to indicate only small things changed), or should we
>>rather use 0.3.3? I am still tending more to 0.3.
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 10:41 pm, Max Horn wrote:
> Also, is it a good idea to use 0.3.2a (originally I thought this was
> good to indicate only small things changed), or should we rather use
> 0.3.3? I am still tending more to 0.3.2a, but I am certainly open on
> suggestions :)
'a'
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 04:15 am, Mike Barnes wrote:
> Oh, small request: could someone put the "include sys/types.h before
> dirent.h" problem into an FAQ somewhere. I manged to get Google to pull
> it out of the list archives, but it wasn't easy. Spent about half an
> hour on that on
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 02:28 am, Dorothy Robinson wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, how is it that "man" on MacOS X doesn't look in
> mann?
What do you mean, "how is it"? It's quite easy, you just don't specify
it in the configuration file for man...
-- Finlay
__
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 01:35 am, Nicholas Orr wrote:
> On 15/1/02 11:57 AM, "Matt Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Finlay has already taken over apache and update the package I think
>> yesterday.
>
> The 1.3.22 in unstable compiles and runs just fine on my powerbook. No
>
> Do the doc and bin packages need DocFiles?
Every package needs DocFiles (or a less-automated installation of something
into %p/share/doc/%n).
-- Dave
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-d
Hi,
I am about to sumbit new versions of db3 and db4 to the tracker.
First though, I have split them into:
db3
db3-bin
db3-doc
db4
db4-bin
db4-doc
The docs are about 6Mb each on my HFS+ disks, and most users
don't need them, so...
Question:
Do the doc and bin packages need DocFiles?
Also note
Le lundi 14 janvier 2002, à 10:36 PM, Max Horn a écrit :
> At 16:05 Uhr -0700 13.01.2002, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
>> Max:
>>
>> I think the best solution for now is to create fink man package and
>> have
>> packages like tcltk that put stuff in sections not supported by the
>> apple
>> man, depen
21 matches
Mail list logo
