[Fink-devel] Cannot install fort77: directory gone

2002-03-06 Thread Ben Gertzfield
I tried to install imagemagick today from unstable, and when it got to the point where it downloaded the fort77 source (why the heck does an image processor need Fortran? *grumble*) it failed: The following package will be installed or updated: imagemagick The following 7 additional packages wil

Re: [Fink-devel] Initial plitoffs code now in CVS

2002-03-06 Thread David R. Morrison
Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > Besides the big chunk, splitoff support, I changed a few other minor > things, most notably percent expansion is now also done in the > Depends/BuildDepends/Conflicts/Replaces/Provides fields. It would be good to do percent expansion for "Suggests"

Re: [Fink-devel] Initial plitoffs code now in CVS

2002-03-06 Thread David R. Morrison
I have one small correction to make to the example Max gave: SplitOff: << Package: %N-shlibs Depends: othertest # Note: files uses the same syntax as DocFiles, only that pathes are # relativ to %i and not to %p Files: lib/libfoobar.0.23.dylib, lib/libfoobar.0.dylib DocFiles: COPYING

[Fink-devel] Initial plitoffs code now in CVS

2002-03-06 Thread Max Horn
I just added code to CVS that enables initial splitoff support. All brave developers please go ahead and install it and test how it works. To do so, check out the "fink" CVS module and use the inject.pl script. I'd like to get as much feedback in short time as possible, even if no package doe

Re: [Fink-devel] Creating a package

2002-03-06 Thread David R. Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bertrand Lupart) wrote: > > If you want to make packages for Fink, yoiu'll need to use the .info file > > format. Please read the documentation on the Fink site (http://fink.sf.net), > > especially the FAQ and the Packaging Manual. > > That's what i was doing, but i didn't see

Re: [Fink-devel] Creating a package

2002-03-06 Thread Bertrand Lupart
> Fink isn't a port of Debian to Darwin. It just happens to use the Debian > package manager as part of its toolchain. OK, i missed that point. > If you want to make packages for Fink, yoiu'll need to use the .info file > format. Please read the documentation on the Fink site (http://fink.sf.net

Re: [Fink-devel] Creating a package

2002-03-06 Thread finlay . dobbie
> Isn't it possible to reuse all the debian/ stuff in the sources? Because > this piece of software can be configured with dialogs during the > installation. > > Since i know well the debian package maintainer, this code can be > modified for darwin if needed. Fink isn't a port of Debian to Da

Re: [Fink-devel] slang package

2002-03-06 Thread Max Horn
At 12:28 Uhr +0200 06.03.2002, Andrei Verovski wrote: >Hi, > > >It seems slang 1.4.4 archive have been removed from slang web site. For >1.4.5 patch made by Crisp have to be reworked. Anyone has this old >slang-1.4.4.tgz? It is needed for mc. Slang has been update a long time ago to 1.4.5. That

[Fink-devel] slang package

2002-03-06 Thread Andrei Verovski
Hi, It seems slang 1.4.4 archive have been removed from slang web site. For 1.4.5 patch made by Crisp have to be reworked. Anyone has this old slang-1.4.4.tgz? It is needed for mc. Thanks in advance. ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

Re: [Fink-devel] Creating a package

2002-03-06 Thread Bertrand Lupart
Hi all, > Also, just look at the *.info files for packages that are already in fink. > A lot of ports have the same issues, and you will be able to see how > they are solved within Fink's system "the right way". I'm doing such investingations as Eric does. In my case, the packages i'd like to