Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

I wish :-) or I wish that we cold at least share the wealth with each other... anyone have an extra seed key they don't use? :-) On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 06:00 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: > > On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 05:22 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote: >> Also, "gcc" is gcc3, and

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 05:22 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote: > Also, "gcc" is gcc3, and I think configure scripts search that first. > Not to mention, we'll probably want to move to the gcc3 tool chain ASAP > anyway. :-) I don't suppose there's a chance of all the Fink developers getting see

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

At 11:14 PM +0200 4/20/02, Max Horn wrote: >> > >Note that this says *nothing* at all. Alls OS X compilers so far >called themselves 2.95.2, yet there are substantial differences >between the versions. If you really want to know what version it is, >use "cc -v" Nothing? Seems to say enough to

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

At 11:14 PM +0200 4/20/02, Max Horn wrote: > >Might be. Hm, I haven't downloaded the tools yet, but didn't they >want to ship a tool which allows you to switch between the compiler >versions or something? Yep, yer right.. just read those notes.. (there are a lot of them) At 12:54 PM -0700 4/

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

At 22:22 Uhr +0100 20.04.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote: >On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 10:06 PM, Ben Hines wrote: > >>According to the release notes, the default compiler is still >>2.95.2. In PB you have to set USEGCC3 variable to use gcc3. >> >>More apropos to fink, I have the new tools installed

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 10:06 PM, Ben Hines wrote: > According to the release notes, the default compiler is still 2.95.2. > In PB you have to set USEGCC3 variable to use gcc3. > > More apropos to fink, I have the new tools installed, and cc --version > returns 2.95.2. > > HOWEVER, we

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

At 14:06 Uhr -0700 20.04.2002, Ben Hines wrote: >At 10:05 AM +0100 4/20/02, Finlay Dobbie wrote: >>The April 2002 Developer Tools is out (although it's classed as a >>"public beta" release). Currently it's available only if you have >>an ADC Seed Key, but it should become available to everybody

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

At 10:05 AM +0100 4/20/02, Finlay Dobbie wrote: >The April 2002 Developer Tools is out (although it's classed as a >"public beta" release). Currently it's available only if you have an >ADC Seed Key, but it should become available to everybody else over >the coming week or so. > >Anyway, it inc

Re: [Fink-devel] Problems with templates in C++

On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 03:25 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: > I am working on porting a c++ program that I may bring to fink if I can > get it to work, and I keep running into a problem. Every time I try to > link two object files, one with a template the other needs, I get an > error, for ex

[Fink-devel] FinkCommander 0.2.0 Released

I have made a new release of FinkCommander available on SourceForge, this time in both binary and source code form. Either one can be downloaded directly from the FinkCommander home page: http://finkcommander.sourceforge.net/index.php The most significant new feature is a filter for searchin

Re: [Fink-devel] shared library dependencies (was Re: 0.4.0acandidate)

At 14:15 Uhr -0400 20.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: >Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> At 13:57 Uhr -0400 20.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: >> >Max Horn wrote: >> > >> >> Also we uncovered this problem with the conversion to shlibs: So far, >> >> if you e.g. depend on audiofil

Re: [Fink-devel] shared library dependencies (was Re: 0.4.0a candidate)

Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 13:57 Uhr -0400 20.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: > >Max Horn wrote: > > > >> Also we uncovered this problem with the conversion to shlibs: So far, > >> if you e.g. depend on audiofile, but already depend on FOO which > >> already depended on that, y

Re: [Fink-devel] shared library dependencies (was Re: 0.4.0acandidate)

At 13:57 Uhr -0400 20.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: >Max Horn wrote: > >> Also we uncovered this problem with the conversion to shlibs: So far, >> if you e.g. depend on audiofile, but already depend on FOO which >> already depended on that, you could just drop the audiofile >> dependency.

[Fink-devel] shared library dependencies (was Re: 0.4.0a candidate)

Max Horn wrote: > Also we uncovered this problem with the conversion to shlibs: So far, > if you e.g. depend on audiofile, but already depend on FOO which > already depended on that, you could just drop the audiofile > dependency. But if now FOO is converted to BuildDepend on audiofile, > and

Re: [Fink-devel] fwd: lack of prebinding in fink installedlibraries

At 22:41 Uhr +0100 19.04.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote: >On Friday, April 19, 2002, at 06:27 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: > >>As far as I know, no Fink packages currently enable prebinding of any of >>their libraries. I don't understand the prebinding system very precisely, >>but I suspect that we co

Re: [Fink-devel] 0.4.0a candidate

At 8:27 Uhr -0400 20.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: >I've just fixed a bug in my system-tetex package which made it impossible to >install unless the user already had the Developer Tools installed. (The >post-install script was calling ranlib.) The new version is in the unstable >tree, but I

[Fink-devel] auto config problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am having a lot of trouble getting gift to compile now. autoheader/automake, and everything are giving me major problems now with the new version. I have my info and patch files on the package tracker

[Fink-devel] 0.4.0a candidate

I've just fixed a bug in my system-tetex package which made it impossible to install unless the user already had the Developer Tools installed. (The post-install script was calling ranlib.) The new version is in the unstable tree, but I would like to suggest that it is a candidate for inclusion

[Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

The April 2002 Developer Tools is out (although it's classed as a "public beta" release). Currently it's available only if you have an ADC Seed Key, but it should become available to everybody else over the coming week or so. Anyway, it includes a toolchain based on gcc3.1, so I expect some Fi