So the PDB right now still displays information for the old package tree.
So, we will want it to display data for the 10.2 tree in the future.
the question is only, how do we want to go about this:
1) simply show the 10.2 package list instead of the 10.1 packages
That's the simplest solution
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 08:55 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> So the PDB right now still displays information for the old package
> tree.
>
> So, we will want it to display data for the 10.2 tree in the future.
> the question is only, how do we want to go about this:
>
> 1) simply show the 1
Let me suggest that if we are going to go for option 1, that the labels
on the pdb web page make this clear, i.e.,
In 0.4.1-stable (10.1):
In current-stable (10.2):
In current-unstable (10.2):
I also think that when we release 0.5.0, for some transition period we
should include four lines
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Steve Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed Oct 16, 2002 10:35:43 AM US/Pacific
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Fink on OSDir.com (new O'Reilly site)
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> I run the new Open Source site for O'Reilly: http://OSDir.com
>
> I've just added Fink to
E.g., bind9-ssl doesn't work as is _ named never starts.
This is because, in daemonic-bind9:
if [ -x /sw/sbin/named -c /sw/etc/bind/named.conf -a -f
/sw/etc/bind/named.conf ]; then
# run the daemon
/sw/sbin/named -c /sw/etc/bind/named.conf &
fi
Doesn't work (logical...):
At 10:48 Uhr -0700 16.10.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
>Begin forwarded message:
>
>>From: Steve Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Wed Oct 16, 2002 10:35:43 AM US/Pacific
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Fink on OSDir.com (new O'Reilly site)
>>
>>Hi Ben,
>>
>>I run the new Open Source site for O'Re
At 19:49 Uhr +0200 16.10.2002, jfm wrote:
>E.g., bind9-ssl doesn't work as is _ named never starts.
>
[...]
>But how to do this in the info file ?
>I guess this comes from the line :
>
>%p/sbin/named -c
>%p/etc/bind/named.conf
>
>The " -c %p/etc/bind/named.conf " is needed there for launching t
At 16:22 Uhr -0300 16.10.2002, Steve Mallett wrote:
>Max Horn wrote:
[...]
>>
>>Simple question: what is in for us? What do we gain by advertising
>>for OSDir.com ? I see what *they* gain, namely free advertisment.
>>But we?
>>
>>
>>Before I say "yes" to such a change to the Fink website, I'd
> Sure. To clarify what I wrote: I do not seriously think O'Reilly /
> OSDIr.com is trying to "rip us off", I don't have such a bad opinion of
> your guys (I actually have a quite positive opinion about O'Reilly).
>
> What I wanted to convey is: I see that you gain something by this
> (though
I was trying to install bioperl-pm-1.0.2-3-- one of those packages
which seems to
require every package under the sun.
The *.info file has a Suggests line, but it does not mention
file-temp-pm, xml-writer-pm, xml-twig-pm or stringy-pm, all of which
seem to be desired by bioperl. So I added them
I was trying to install bioperl-pm-1.0.2-3-- one of those packages
which seems to
require every package under the sun.
The *.info file has a Suggests line, but it does not mention
file-temp-pm, xml-writer-pm, xml-twig-pm or stringy-pm, all of which
seem to be desired by bioperl. So I added them
Is anyone making on a program to help generate and edit fink info files?
I'm thinking of writing some shell scripts, possibly even something in
C. To start with it would provide a template with the minimum required
fields, and automatically wrap long descriptions and enclose them in <<.
Any t
12 matches
Mail list logo
