Thank you all for your help! The getopt problem is solved now.
Étienne
---
This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of
Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM))
program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;
The problem was caused by old Fink releases (0.4.0, 0.3.2 etc.) still
being in the DB. Normally this would not be a problem, as the PDB
scripts filter for the release, but in this case the total number was
simply listing all packages.
I guess we might want to change that (and also list.php) to
At 13:46 Uhr -0700 22.10.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
Seems to be showing some shlibs again..
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/section.php/libs
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/aalib-shlibs
I actually got it running locally based on the scripts/pdb sources,
and I only show 1092 packages as
At 18:44 Uhr +0200 22.10.2002, Christian Schaffner wrote:
Hi Jean-Francois
On Dienstag, Oktober 22, 2002, at 05:51 Uhr, jfm wrote:
Good to see it appearing in 10.2 !
It's a first start, and will get better... (E.g. svn-server etc.)
But please, give an alternative neon23 | neon23-ssl in the
Seems to be showing some shlibs again..
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/section.php/libs
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/aalib-shlibs
I actually got it running locally based on the scripts/pdb sources, and
I only show 1092 packages as opposed to fink.sf.net's 1193. Also the
scripts/
On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 18:44 Europe/Brussels, Christian Schaffner
wrote:
But please, give an alternative neon23 | neon23-ssl in the Depends
and the BuildDepends...
Mhmmm... I am not sure about that. I was thinking of doing a
svn-client-ssl variant. Do you think that is not needed? I was
Hi Jean-Francois
On Dienstag, Oktober 22, 2002, at 05:51 Uhr, jfm wrote:
Good to see it appearing in 10.2 !
It's a first start, and will get better... (E.g. svn-server etc.)
But please, give an alternative neon23 | neon23-ssl in the Depends
and the BuildDepends...
Mhmmm... I am not sure ab
