[Fink-devel] Fink Info-Editor program: alpha code available

2002-10-31 Thread Carsten Klapp
Hi, I've been working on a program to edit Fink Info files. It's nowhere near complete but it's stable enough if anyone wants to look at the code and contribute to or take over the development. It has taken me a long time to get this far, although I have some experience working in C I have non

[Fink-devel] Re: [M-dev]Dim3 Animator

2002-10-31 Thread Alexander Strange
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 31 October 2002 04:46 pm, Rok Rokkonuss wrote: > Still asking about what file formats the Dim3 animator can handle. I'm > not gonna be able to test this because durring the installation of Fink, > My OSX has fritzed out. Yeah, our (Fink

Re: [Fink-devel] LIBRARY_PATH problem found...

2002-10-31 Thread Max Horn
Anybody who built gettext using fink with my experimental LIBRARY_PATH changes, but before the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH I added shortly ago, should rebuild it. The reason: gettext would not build it's dylib's, accounting for many build problems, e.g. the one in freetype (which now builds just fine ov

Re: [Fink-devel] help needed testing replacement fink 0.4.1 binary installer

2002-10-31 Thread David R. Morrison
Can someone please test Martin's installer package? You'll need at 10.1.x system to test it. (I won't have access to a 10.1.x system until next Monday at the earliest, myself.) Not only should you test that it installs OK, but you should check what happens if you use the installer severl times i

Re: [Fink-devel] help needed testing replacement fink 0.4.1 binaryinstaller

2002-10-31 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote: Maybe somebody else can make a new 0.4.1 installer? I'll be happy to talk you through the process... In case this is still needed, I made one. It looks OK to me, but since I had never touched PackageMaker before, it would be necessary that someone else tested it. It

Re: [Fink-devel] LIBRARY_PATH problem found...

2002-10-31 Thread Max Horn
Change is in CVS now. A first test was successful: libtool14 built now. I am now trying to build gtk+2 and freetype, but that will take longer. Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-494890

[Fink-devel] LIBRARY_PATH problem found...

2002-10-31 Thread Max Horn
OK I think I figured out the source of most (all?) the weird problem I have seen with the experimental fink changes (which use LIBRARY_PATH instead of LDFLAGS). In short: libtool Longer explanation: libtool doesn't know about LIBRARY_PATH. Thus we get many message like this: *** Warning: This

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 build failure - maybe due to fink CVS changes?

2002-10-31 Thread jfm
And I forgot : in the configure part, I have : checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... no JF Mertens --- This sf.net email is spons

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 build failure - maybe due to fink CVS changes?

2002-10-31 Thread jfm
On Thursday, Oct 31, 2002, at 20:06 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: I tried building gtk+2-2.0.6-2 and it failed with this: rm -fr .libs/im-viqr.la .libs/im-viqr.* .libs/im-viqr.* ar cru .libs/im-viqr.a imviqr.lo ranlib .libs/im-viqr.a creating im-viqr.la (cd .libs && rm -f im-viqr.la && ln -s

Re: [Fink-devel] doc section

2002-10-31 Thread Max Horn
At 14:36 Uhr -0500 31.10.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 does anyone have any opinions/objections on creating a doc section in fink? I just packaged the autobook and was thinking of doing some other packages as well. Personally I don't se the value in

[Fink-devel] doc section

2002-10-31 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 does anyone have any opinions/objections on creating a doc section in fink? I just packaged the autobook and was thinking of doing some other packages as well. - -chris zubrzycki - - -- PGP public key: http://homepage.mac.com/beren/publickey.txt ID

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 build failure - maybe due to fink CVSchanges?

2002-10-31 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 14:06, Max Horn wrote: > I tried building gtk+2-2.0.6-2 and it failed with this: > > * does this package build correctly for all of you with fink 0.11.0 ? > * assuming the answer to the above is "yes", any idea what could > cause this problem? It built fine for me with f

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 build failure - maybe due to fink CVS changes?

2002-10-31 Thread Max Horn
I tried building gtk+2-2.0.6-2 and it failed with this: rm -fr .libs/im-viqr.la .libs/im-viqr.* .libs/im-viqr.* ar cru .libs/im-viqr.a imviqr.lo ranlib .libs/im-viqr.a creating im-viqr.la (cd .libs && rm -f im-viqr.la && ln -s ../im-viqr.la im-viqr.la) ../../gtk/gtk-query-immodules-2.0 *.la > gtk