David R. Morrison wrote:
A major new release of teTeX is imminent. If anyone would like to help
me test it, I've got packages called tetex-texmf-beta and tetex-beta
for the current release candidate, in the experimental/dmrrsn CVS
module.
Dave,
I am still stuck in the install phase:
First, I
My install went fine (syst-tex was where it was supposed to be) and
everything seems to be working. I have tested it out on a document that
uses T1 fonts and it renders them correctly, also correctly calls on
ghostscript to render included postscript figures.
You might want to configure it
I see what caused Martin's problems, and I'm working on a revised version.
Thanks for the suggestion about ~/Library/texmf Bill; I will implement that.
-- Dave
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM +
So the discussion came up on the fink irc channel again about libtool
and namespaces. I recall being rejected in wanting to add support for
linker namespaces in libtool in the thread following this post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/libtool@gnu.org/msg03042.html
...but looking at the
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:23 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
He suggested changing it to -multiply_defined suppress prebind,
which seems to be the solution, if libtool doesn't want to support
specifying the namespace on the libtool command-line.
This would make libtool default to making
I've put a second revision of my experimental teTeX packages in the
experimental/dmrrsn CVS module.
I appreciate the feedback!
By the way, folks helping me test will probably need to remove the beta
packages by hand, when the final version comes out.
-- Dave
Dave,
the second revision failed to install with the following error message
(I put the new files in my local tree and did fink update tetex-beta).
...
Transcript written on mptopdf.log.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/lambda.oft installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/omega.oft installed.
William McCallum wrote:
Dave,
the second revision failed to install with the following error message
(I put the new files in my local tree and did fink update tetex-beta).
Hah! This time it installed OK for me. Funny...
--
Martin
---
How do I convince fink to reinstall the older version of tetex-beta? It
insists on wanting to install version 2, even though I've removed
everything associated with it (then, of course, it complains that it
can't find the package description). I've tried giving it the explicit
version number,
Sorry, Bill. You'll need to install things in this order, by version number:
tetex-beta-shlibs, tetex-beta-base, tetex-beta-x11tools, tetex-beta.
Or, remove both the .info file and the .deb files (which might be someplace
like /sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc, depending on where
10 matches
Mail list logo
